A Steiner1, B Walsh, R M Pickering, R Wiles, J Ward, J I Brooking. 1. Departments of Geriatric Medicine and Social Work Studies, University of Southampton, Murray Building, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK. steiner@cats.ucsc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare post-acute intermediate care in an inpatient nurse-led unit with conventional post-acute care on general medical wards of an acute hospital and to examine the model of care in a nurse-led unit. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with six month follow up. SETTING:Urban teaching hospital and surrounding area, including nine community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 238 patients accepted for admission to nurse-led unit. INTERVENTIONS: Care in nurse-led unit or usual post-acute care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' length of stay, functional status, subsequent move to more dependent living arrangement. RESULTS:Inpatient length of stay was significantly longer in the nurse-led unit than in general medical wards (14.3 days longer (95% confidence interval 7.8 to 20.7)), but this difference became non-significant when transfers to community hospitals were included in the measure of initial length of stay (4.5 days longer (-3.6 to 12.5)). No differences were observed in mortality, functional status, or living arrangements at any time. Patients in the nurse-led unit received significantly fewer minor medical investigations and, after controlling for length of stay, significantly fewer major reviews, tests, or drug changes. CONCLUSIONS: The nurse-led unit seemed to be a safe alternative to conventional management, but a full accounting of such units' place in the local continuum of care and the costs associated with acute hospitals managing post-acute patients is needed if nurse-led units are to become an effective part of the government's recent commitment to intermediate care.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To compare post-acute intermediate care in an inpatient nurse-led unit with conventional post-acute care on general medical wards of an acute hospital and to examine the model of care in a nurse-led unit. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with six month follow up. SETTING: Urban teaching hospital and surrounding area, including nine community hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 238 patients accepted for admission to nurse-led unit. INTERVENTIONS: Care in nurse-led unit or usual post-acute care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' length of stay, functional status, subsequent move to more dependent living arrangement. RESULTS: Inpatient length of stay was significantly longer in the nurse-led unit than in general medical wards (14.3 days longer (95% confidence interval 7.8 to 20.7)), but this difference became non-significant when transfers to community hospitals were included in the measure of initial length of stay (4.5 days longer (-3.6 to 12.5)). No differences were observed in mortality, functional status, or living arrangements at any time. Patients in the nurse-led unit received significantly fewer minor medical investigations and, after controlling for length of stay, significantly fewer major reviews, tests, or drug changes. CONCLUSIONS: The nurse-led unit seemed to be a safe alternative to conventional management, but a full accounting of such units' place in the local continuum of care and the costs associated with acute hospitals managing post-acute patients is needed if nurse-led units are to become an effective part of the government's recent commitment to intermediate care.
Authors: J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham Journal: Lancet Date: 1996-11-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Thomas Plochg; Diana M J Delnoij; Tineke F van der Kruk; Tonnie A C M Janmaat; Niek S Klazinga Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2005-05-24 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Susannah Tomkins; Elizabeth Allen; Olga Savenko; Jim McCambridge; Lyudmila Saburova; Nikolay Kiryanov; Alexey Oralov; Artyom Gil; David A Leon; Martin McKee; Diana Elbourne Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-03-31 Impact factor: 2.655