Literature DB >> 10684957

The effectiveness of intermediate care in a nursing-led in-patient unit.

P Griffiths1, J Wilson-Barnett, G Richardson, K Spilsbury, F Miller, R Harris.   

Abstract

In order to assess the potential for a nursing-led in-patient unit (NLIU) to substitute for a period of care in the acute hospital environment and promote recovery before discharge, a randomised controlled trial was conducted. The setting was an acute inner London hospital trust, part of the UK's national health service. Of patients referred to a NLIU from acute wards, 80 were randomly assigned to usual care (remain in normal hospital system) and 97 to the NLIU (nursing-led care with no routine medical involvement). Patients were identified as medically stable but in need of additional nursing intervention by referring medical staff prior to full nursing assessment of suitability. Outcomes compared included functional dependence (Barthel Index), discharge destination and length of hospital stay. Inputs from nursing, paramedical and medical staff were measured. There was no significant difference in functional independence at discharge (p0.05). Patients undergoing usual care stayed in hospital for less time (mean difference 18 days, p<0.01) but the same number of patients were in hospital 90 days after recruitment (23% NLIU, 24% usual care p0.05) due to re-admissions. The model of care implemented differed considerably from that described in the literature with the NLIU having significantly fewer qualified nurses (RNs). Although the anticipated benefits of the NLIU were not demonstrated, the study does not conclude that the model should be rejected. Factors driving length of stay need to be further investigated, as does the possibility of post-discharge benefits. The NLIU does offer some potential to substitute for acute care but also appears to substitute for a period of primary care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10684957     DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7489(99)00061-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud        ISSN: 0020-7489            Impact factor:   5.837


  7 in total

1.  Therapeutic nursing or unblocking beds? A randomised controlled trial of a post-acute intermediate care unit.

Authors:  A Steiner; B Walsh; R M Pickering; R Wiles; J Ward; J I Brooking
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-24

2.  A cost effectiveness analysis within a randomised controlled trial of post-acute care of older people in a community hospital.

Authors:  Jacqueline O'Reilly; Karin Lowson; John Young; Anne Forster; John Green; Neil Small
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-07-21

3.  Economic evaluation of nurse led intermediate care versus standard care for post-acute medical patients: cost minimisation analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Bronagh Walsh; Andrea Steiner; Ruth M Pickering; Jilly Ward-Basu
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-09

Review 4.  Effectiveness of intermediate care in nursing-led in-patient units.

Authors:  P D Griffiths; M H Edwards; A Forbes; R L Harris; G Ritchie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

5.  Correlates of rehabilitation hospital length of stay among older African-American patients.

Authors:  Terry L Mills; Peter A Lichtenberg; Melanie A Wakeman; Hellena Scott-Okafor
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  A qualitative examination of inappropriate hospital admissions and lengths of stay.

Authors:  Christina L Hammond; Lorraine L Pinnington; Margaret F Phillips
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Intermediate care: for better or worse? Process evaluation of an intermediate care model between a university hospital and a residential home.

Authors:  Thomas Plochg; Diana M J Delnoij; Tineke F van der Kruk; Tonnie A C M Janmaat; Niek S Klazinga
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.