Literature DB >> 11220275

[Rehabilitation of anophthalmic patients. Results of a survey].

C Hintschich1, L Baldeschi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We surveyed ocularists' views on orbital implants, secondary surgical procedures, patient satisfaction, and cooperation between ophthalmologists and ocularists.
METHOD: A 14-item questionnaire was sent to all 29 ocularists working in Germany all 4 in the Netherlands.
RESULTS: Primary implants are generally recommended, preferably dermofat grafts and ,,baseball" implants. Outcome depends crucially upon surgical procedure and postoperative course. Scepticism is common toward secondary surgical procedures, with the success rate estimated at 70%. Cooperation between ocularists and ophthalmologists is generally regarded as unsatisfactory, also the information provided to the patients by the ophthalmologist after enucleation.
CONCLUSIONS: The ocularists demand best possible enucleation techniques including the use of primary implants. However, they are critical toward secondary procedures for correcting postenucleation socket syndrome. Cooperation between ocularists and ophthalmologists need to be improved in providing patient care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11220275     DOI: 10.1007/s003470170203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmologe        ISSN: 0941-293X            Impact factor:   1.059


  5 in total

1.  [Dermis-fat graft. Possibilities and limitations].

Authors:  C Hintschich
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Periocular plastic surgery.

Authors:  Christoph Hintschich
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  [Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications].

Authors:  K R Koch; W Trester; N Müller-Uri; M Trester; C Cursiefen; L M Heindl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  UK national survey of enucleation, evisceration and orbital implant trends.

Authors:  P Viswanathan; Mandeep S Sagoo; Jane M Olver
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  [Congenital clinical anophthalmia and blind microphthalmia].

Authors:  M P Schittkowski; K K H Gundlach; R F Guthoff
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 1.059

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.