Literature DB >> 11218340

Individual differences in spatial learning from computer-simulated environments.

D Waller1.   

Abstract

A multivariate study examined relationships between the following factors: paper-and-pencil assessments of verbal and spatial ability, ability to form an accurate spatial representation of a large real-world environment, gender, computer attitudes and experience, proficiency with the navigational interface of a virtual environment (VE), and the ability to acquire and transfer spatial knowledge from a VE. Psychometrically assessed spatial ability and proficiency with the navigational interface were found to make substantial contributions to individual differences in the ability to acquire spatial information from a VE. Gender influenced many VE-related tasks, primarily through its relationship with interface proficiency and spatial ability. Measures of spatial knowledge of a VE maze were highly predictive of subsequent performance in a similar real-world maze, suggesting that VEs can be useful for training people about real-world spaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11218340     DOI: 10.1037//1076-898x.6.4.307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl        ISSN: 1076-898X


  20 in total

1.  Memory for targets in a multilevel simulated environment: evidence for vertical asymmetry in spatial memory.

Authors:  Paul N Wilson; Nigel Foreman; Danaë Stanton; Hester Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

2.  A meta-analysis on the correlation between measurements of spatial tasks and standardized tests of environmental spatial abilities.

Authors:  Corina Sas; Nurul Mohd Noor
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09

3.  Route and survey processing of topographical memory during navigation.

Authors:  Luca Latini-Corazzini; Marie Pascale Nesa; Mathieu Ceccaldi; Eric Guedj; Catherine Thinus-Blanc; Franco Cauda; Federico D'Agata; Federico Dagata; Patrick Péruch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-02-20

4.  Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Xinyi Gong; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

5.  Active route learning in virtual environments: disentangling movement control from intention, instruction specificity, and navigation control.

Authors:  Rul von Stülpnagel; Melanie C Steffens
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-08-26

6.  Dissociable retrosplenial and hippocampal contributions to successful formation of survey representations.

Authors:  Thomas Wolbers; Christian Büchel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Learning building layouts with non-geometric visual information: the effects of visual impairment and age.

Authors:  Amy A Kalia; Gordon E Legge; Nicholas A Giudice
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Assessing human reorientation ability inside virtual reality environments: the effects of retention interval and landmark characteristics.

Authors:  Andrea Bosco; Luciana Picucci; Alessandro O Caffò; Giulio E Lancioni; Valérie Gyselinck
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-20

9.  Navigation performance in virtual environments varies with fractal dimension of landscape.

Authors:  Arthur W Juliani; Alexander J Bies; Cooper R Boydston; Richard P Taylor; Margaret E Sereno
Journal:  J Environ Psychol       Date:  2016-09

10.  Turning bias in virtual spatial navigation: age-related differences and neuroanatomical correlates.

Authors:  Peng Yuan; Ana M Daugherty; Naftali Raz
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 3.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.