Literature DB >> 11216716

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the lateral third of the ipsilateral patellar tendon after failure of a central-third graft: a preliminary report on 10 patients.

G W Woods1, A L Fincher, D P O'Connor, S A Bacon.   

Abstract

Long-term outcomes were reported for 10 (77%) of 13 cases of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the lateral third of the ipsilateral patellar tendon as a graft. All primary ACL reconstructions were ipsilateral central-third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft procedures. Mean age at follow-up was 30.7 years, and mean time from revision ACL surgery to follow-up was 42.9 months. At follow-up, average KT-1000 difference between knees was 2.4 mm. All patients had a negative pivot shift, extension within 5 degrees of the contralateral knee, and flexion within 15 degrees. Mean bilateral comparison ratios for isokinetic strength and hop testing were: extension, 83.5%; flexion, 96%; and single-leg hop 96.9%. No patella fractures or tendon ruptures had occurred. All patients had returned to their previous work level, and 8 of the 10 patients could participate in at least "moderate" sports activities (e.g., skiing and tennis). The results were comparable to published outcome reports for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction. The lateral third of the ipsilateral patellar tendon is a good graft option for revision ACL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11216716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Knee Surg        ISSN: 0899-7403


  7 in total

1.  Revision ACL reconstruction: influence of a lateral tenodesis.

Authors:  Christophe Trojani; Philippe Beaufils; Gilles Burdin; Christophe Bussière; Vincent Chassaing; Patrick Djian; Frédéric Dubrana; François-Paul Ehkirch; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Christophe Hulet; Franck Jouve; Jean-François Potel; Abderahmane Sbihi; Philippe Neyret; Philippe Colombet
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Causes for failure of ACL reconstruction and influence of meniscectomies after revision.

Authors:  Christophe Trojani; Abderahmane Sbihi; Patrick Djian; Jean-François Potel; Christophe Hulet; Frank Jouve; Christophe Bussière; François-Paul Ehkirch; Gilles Burdin; Frédéric Dubrana; Philippe Beaufils; Jean-Pierre Franceschi; Vincent Chassaing; Philippe Colombet; Philippe Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Failure of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gonzalo Samitier; Alejandro I Marcano; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Ramon Cugat; Kevin W Farmer; Michael W Moser
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 4.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Corey S Gill; Ling Chen; Robert H Brophy; Matthew J Matava; Matthew V Smith; Nathan A Mall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The course of the patellar tendon after reharvesting its central third for ACL revision surgery: a long-term clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  Mattias Lidén; Lars Ejerhed; Ninni Sernert; Ake Bovaller; Jon Karlsson; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Regional mechanical properties of human patellar tendon allografts.

Authors:  Adam Yanke; Rebecca Bell; Andrew Lee; Elizabeth F Shewman; Vincent Wang; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 4.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.