Literature DB >> 16951974

The course of the patellar tendon after reharvesting its central third for ACL revision surgery: a long-term clinical and radiographic study.

Mattias Lidén1, Lars Ejerhed, Ninni Sernert, Ake Bovaller, Jon Karlsson, Jüri Kartus.   

Abstract

The choice of the optimal graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision surgery is still controversial. Reharvesting the patellar tendon has been suggested as one graft alternative. Our hypothesis was that in the long-term, ACL revision surgery using reharvested patellar tendon autografts would render a good clinical outcome and a normal patellar tendon at the donor site as seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Fourteen consecutive patients (five women, nine men), who underwent ACL revision surgery using reharvested ipsilateral patellar tendon grafts, were included in the study. They underwent bilateral MRI evaluations of the patellar tendon and were tested for clinical outcome 26 (20-35) and 115 months (102-127) after the revision procedure. On the second occasion, they also underwent standard weight-bearing X-ray examinations. The serial MRI evaluations revealed that the thickness of the patellar tendon at the donor site was significantly increased compared with the non-harvested, normal contralateral side and that the donor-site gap was still visible after 10 years. No significant differences were seen between the 2- and 10-year MRI evaluations. Standard weight-bearing X-ray examinations revealed signs of mild degenerative changes in all patients. Clinical results in terms of the Lysholm score, IKDC evaluation system, one-leg-hop test, KT-1000 laxity test and the knee-walking test revealed no significant differences between the 2- and 10-year assessments. In overall terms, the clinical results were considered to be poor on both occasions. The patellar tendon at the donor site had not normalised 10 years after the reharvesting procedure, as seen on MRI. Furthermore, the clinical results were poor after ACL revision surgery using reharvested patellar tendon autograft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16951974     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0167-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  45 in total

1.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: report of 11-year experience and results in 114 consecutive patients.

Authors:  F R Noyes; S D Barber-Westin
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

2.  Rupture of the quadriceps tendon after a central third patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J C DeLee; D F Craviotto
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

4.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the lateral third of the ipsilateral patellar tendon after failure of a central-third graft: a preliminary report on 10 patients.

Authors:  G W Woods; A L Fincher; D P O'Connor; S A Bacon
Journal:  Am J Knee Surg       Date:  2001

7.  Fractures associated with patellar ligament grafts in cruciate ligament surgery.

Authors:  B Christen; R P Jakob
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-07

8.  Does the patellar tendon normalize after harvesting its central third?: a prospective long-term MRI study.

Authors:  Michael Svensson; Jüri Kartus; Lars Ejerhed; Sven Lindahl; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Rupture of the patellar tendon after use of its central third.

Authors:  P Langan; A P Fontanetta
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1987-05

10.  Validation and application of a subjective knee questionnaire.

Authors:  J Höher; A Münster; J Klein; E Eypasch; T Tiling
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  8 in total

1.  The reharvested patellar tendon has the potential for ligamentization when used for anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery.

Authors:  Sven Stener; Lars Ejerhed; Tomas Movin; Ninni Sernert; Nikos Papadogiannakis; Jüri Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical outcome and evidence for return to sport.

Authors:  Luca Andriolo; Giuseppe Filardo; Elizaveta Kon; Margherita Ricci; Francesco Della Villa; Stefano Della Villa; Stefano Zaffagnini; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Outcome of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Corey S Gill; Ling Chen; Robert H Brophy; Matthew J Matava; Matthew V Smith; Nathan A Mall
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  What Is the Mid-term Failure Rate of Revision ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; Christopher Kim; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Stefano Zaffagnini; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Investigating tendon mineralisation in the avian hindlimb: a model for tendon ageing, injury and disease.

Authors:  Natacha A Agabalyan; Darrell J R Evans; Rachael L Stanley
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Healing of donor site in bone-tendon-bone ACL reconstruction accelerated with plasma rich in growth factors: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Roberto Seijas; Marta Rius; Oscar Ares; Montserrat García-Balletbó; Iván Serra; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A practical guide.

Authors:  Alberto Grassi; James R Bailey; Cecilia Signorelli; Giuseppe Carbone; Andy Tchonang Wakam; Gian Andrea Lucidi; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-18

8.  Association Between Graft Choice and 6-Year Outcomes of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Laura J Huston; Amanda K Haas; Jacquelyn S Pennings; Christina R Allen; Daniel E Cooper; Thomas M DeBerardino; Warren R Dunn; Brett Brick A Lantz; Kurt P Spindler; Michael J Stuart; John P Albright; Annunziato Ned Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Christopher C Annunziata; Robert A Arciero; Bernard R Bach; Champ L Baker; Arthur R Bartolozzi; Keith M Baumgarten; Jeffery R Bechler; Jeffrey H Berg; Geoffrey A Bernas; Stephen F Brockmeier; Robert H Brophy; Charles A Bush-Joseph; J Brad Butler V; John D Campbell; James L Carey; James E Carpenter; Brian J Cole; Jonathan M Cooper; Charles L Cox; R Alexander Creighton; Diane L Dahm; Tal S David; David C Flanigan; Robert W Frederick; Theodore J Ganley; Elizabeth A Garofoli; Charles J Gatt; Steven R Gecha; James Robert Giffin; Sharon L Hame; Jo A Hannafin; Christopher D Harner; Norman Lindsay Harris; Keith S Hechtman; Elliott B Hershman; Rudolf G Hoellrich; David C Johnson; Timothy S Johnson; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Ganesh V Kamath; Thomas E Klootwyk; Bruce A Levy; C Benjamin Ma; G Peter Maiers; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Gregory M Mathien; David R McAllister; Eric C McCarty; Robert G McCormack; Bruce S Miller; Carl W Nissen; Daniel F O'Neill; Brett D Owens; Richard D Parker; Mark L Purnell; Arun J Ramappa; Michael A Rauh; Arthur C Rettig; Jon K Sekiya; Kevin G Shea; Orrin H Sherman; James R Slauterbeck; Matthew V Smith; Jeffrey T Spang; Ltc Steven J Svoboda; Timothy N Taft; Joachim J Tenuta; Edwin M Tingstad; Armando F Vidal; Darius G Viskontas; Richard A White; James S Williams; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; James J York
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 7.010

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.