Literature DB >> 11216312

Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.

S E Gathercole1, S J Pickering, M Hall, S M Peaker.   

Abstract

The impact of the lexicality of memory items on memory performance was compared in two paradigms, serial recall and serial recognition. Experiments 1 to 3 tested 7- and 8-year-old children. Memory accuracy was only mildly impaired in lists containing nonwords compared with words in a serial recognition task involving judgments of whether the items in two sequences were in the same order (Experiment 1), although a substantial advantage for word over nonword items from the same stimulus pool was found in serial recall (Experiment 2). A stronger influence of lexicality on serial recall than serial recognition was further demonstrated in Experiments 3A and 3B, and in 4A and 4B using adult participants. These experiments also established comparable degrees of sensitivity to the phonological similarity of the memory sequences in the two paradigms. The phonological similarity effect in serial recall was found to arise from increased phoneme order errors, whereas the lexicality effect was due principally to the greater frequency of phoneme identity errors for nonwords. It is proposed that the lexicality effect originates in the redintegration of item information just prior to recall, and that this process is largely bypassed in serial recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11216312     DOI: 10.1080/02724980042000002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  23 in total

1.  [Phonological loop and low level phonological processing in preschool children].

Authors:  M Ptok; A Dunkelmann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  All parts of an item are not equal: effects of phonological redundancy on immediate recall.

Authors:  Elisabet Service; Sini Maury
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

3.  Advantages and disadvantages of phonological similarity in serial recall and serial recognition of nonwords.

Authors:  Arild Lian; Paul Johan Karlsen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-03

4.  Redintegration and lexicality effects in children: do they depend upon the demands of the memory task?

Authors:  Judy E Turner; Lucy A Henry; Philip T Smith; Penelope A Brown
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-04

5.  Modulating the phonological similarity effect: the contribution of interlist similarity and lexicality.

Authors:  Paul Johan Karlsen; Arild Lian
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-04

6.  Individual differences in phonological learning and verbal STM span.

Authors:  Elisabet Service; Sini Maury; Emilia Luotoniemi
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-07

7.  Semantic contribution to verbal short-term memory: are pleasant words easier to remember than neutral words in serial recall and serial recognition?

Authors:  Catherine Monnier; Arielle Syssau
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

8.  The impact of semantic impairment on verbal short-term memory in stroke aphasia and semantic dementia: A comparative study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Jefferies; Paul Hoffman; Roy Jones; Matthew A Lambon Ralph
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.059

9.  [Phonological loop and minimal pair discrimination in preschool children].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Lichte; N Buller; T Wink; C L Naumann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.284

10.  Implicit working memory.

Authors:  Ran R Hassin; John A Bargh; Andrew D Engell; Kathleen C McCulloch
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2009-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.