Literature DB >> 11215291

Laboratory testing under managed care dominance in the USA.

Y Takemura1, J R Beck.   

Abstract

The uncontrolled escalation of total health care expenditure despite the government's endeavours during the past decades in the USA had led to the rapid infiltration of managed care organisations (MCOs). Traditional hospital based laboratories have been placed in a crucial situation with the advent of the managed care era. A massive reduction of in house testing urged them to develop strategies against financial difficulty. Consolidation and networking, participation in the outreach testing market, and emphasis on point of care/satellite laboratory testing in non-traditional, ambulatory settings are major strategies for the survival of hospital laboratories. Several physicians' office laboratories (POLS) have closed their doors in response both to regulatory restrictions imposed by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 and to managed care infiltration. It seems likely that POLs and hospital laboratories will continue to reduce test volumes, whereas commercial reference laboratories will thrive through contracting with MCOs. In the current climate of managed care dominance in the USA, clinical laboratories are changing their basic operation focus and mission in response to the aggressively changing landscape.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11215291      PMCID: PMC1731353          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.54.2.89

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  48 in total

Review 1.  Healthcare in the United States and the practice of laboratory medicine.

Authors:  L J Kricka; D Parsons; R B Coolen
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1997-11-06       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 2.  The impact of reimbursement changes on doctors' office testing.

Authors:  L I Iezzoni
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.935

3.  Evaluating STAT testing alternatives by calculating annual laboratory costs.

Authors:  B E Statland; K Brzys
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Longitudinal study of error prevalence in Pennsylvania physicians' office laboratories.

Authors:  M J Bloch; G S Cembrowski; G J Lembesis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-07-08       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Common diagnostic test panels for clinical evaluation of new primary care outpatients in Japan: a cost-effectiveness evaluation.

Authors:  Y Takemura; H Ishida; Y Inoue; J R Beck
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Proficiency of office microbiology testing.

Authors:  R Belsey; D M Baer
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 1.935

7.  Cost-containment and the use of reference laboratories.

Authors:  S T Shaw; J M Miller
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.935

8.  Effect of Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement policies on diagnostic methodology in the physician's office.

Authors:  D W Ortbals
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.803

9.  Regulation of physicians' office laboratories. The Idaho experience.

Authors:  R Crawley; R Belsey; D Brock; D M Baer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-01-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Clinical laboratories. Profit center, production industry or patient-care resource?

Authors:  R B Conn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-02-23       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.