Literature DB >> 11214051

The use of muscle flaps to treat left ventricular assist device infections.

O Z Hutchinson1, M C Oz, J A Ascherman.   

Abstract

Left ventricular assist devices have become an important adjunct in the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with end-stage heart failure. Although they may provide a bridge to transplantation, they are prone to certain problems, expecially infection. Because these are life-sustaining devices, changing the device or simple explantation may be a risky, if not impossible, option. Therefore, we evaluated the effectiveness of a surgical alternative, namely, coverage of infected devices with muscle or myocutaneous flaps. Eighty-two consecutive patients who underwent the insertion of 88 left ventricular assist devices at our institution over a 6.5-year period were evaluated. Follow-up was provided for all patients and ranged from 1 to 7.5 years. The duration of ventricular support ranged from 0 to 434 days. All patients who demonstrated clinical evidence of infection were identified. Overall, 54 patients (66 percent) had infections locally at the device site, at distant sites, or systemically during support. Cultured organisms included gram-positive and -negative bacteria, fungi, and viruses. Of the 56 infections in these 54 patients, 21 (38 percent) were device-related, i.e., in the pocket created by the device, in the device itself, or from the driveline. Thus, 24 percent (21 of 88) of all ventricular support devices inserted demonstrated device infection during use. Therapeutic modalities used to combat device-related infection included both nonsurgical management with antibiotics alone and surgical procedures such as device change or relocation, device explant, and flap coverage. Eight of the 20 patients in whom the 21 device-related infections occurred underwent surgical intervention. Four of these eight patients undenwent local flap coverage of their infected left ventricular assist devices. All four patients also had evidence of systemic infection, or "device endocarditis." Coverage was successfully achieved in all cases with pedicled rectus abdominis flaps. There were no perioperative complications. Two patients later underwent successful transplantation; the other two died from causes unrelated to the flap. In conclusion, the treatment of infected left ventricular assist devices currently includes both nonsurgical and surgical alternatives. Of the latter, muscle flaps should be considered a first-line intervention to assist in eradicating infection by providing well-vascularized tissue. Although there were no perioperative complications, the 50 percent mortality rate is consistent with that reported for patients with "device endocarditis." It may be that flap coverage of infected ventricular assist devices, if instituted at an earlier stage in the therapeutic process, could help prevent systemic infection in these patients and, therefore, improve their overall outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11214051     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200102000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  4 in total

Review 1.  Impact of adverse events on ventricular assist device outcomes.

Authors:  Aleksandar Adzic; Snehal R Patel; Simon Maybaum
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-03

2.  Covering implantable left ventricular assist device (DuraHeart) with free flap.

Authors:  Ken Matsuda; Akimitsu Nishibayashi; Koichi Toda; Takashi Fujiwara; Megumi Fukai; Daisuke Yoshioka; Yoshiki Sawa; Ko Hosokawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 3.  Left ventricular assist device-related infections: past, present and future.

Authors:  Sanjay Maniar; Sreekanth Kondareddy; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.166

4.  Baclofen pump pocket infection: a case report of successful salvage with muscle flap.

Authors:  Bishara S Atiyeh; Shady N Hayek; Ghassan S Skaf; Ali Al Araj; Roukoz B Chamoun
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.