Literature DB >> 11213876

The Oregon Health Plan: predictors of office-based diabetic quality of care.

M Srinivasan1, M Przybylski, N Swigonski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 1994, the Oregon Health Plan (OHP) expanded basic Medicaid insurance to residents under the federal poverty limit, adopted a prioritized limited benefits package, and converted to managed care. The quality of care in predominantly Medicaid populations with diabetes has not been previously described. In OHP enrollees, we examined predictors of diabetes care based on American Diabetes Association guidelines and described OHP diabetes care compared with national benchmarks. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Chart abstraction and Medicaid data for 1995-1996 yielded 996 nonpregnant diabetic patients who were 18-64 years of age. Using HbA1c, lipid panel, and urine protein/microalbumin documentation ordered during the study year, we constructed a standard care (SC) index: SC for all three tests, mixed care (MC) for one to two tests, or no tests documented (NTD).
RESULTS: Our sample was predominantly white, 48 +/- 11 years of age, 63% women, with 8 +/- 5 provider visits. Providers ordered HbA1c (70%), urine microalbumin/protein (57%), and lipid panel (41%) tests. Patients distributed into SC (22%), MC (62%), or NTD (16%). Thirteen variables predicted SC. Patients had a higher likelihood of SC if they were 18-24 years of age, had more clinic visits, were on insulin daily, were in several comorbid groups, were enrolled in salaried or capitated health plans, or lived in counties with more hospital beds. Four studies were used as comparable national benchmarks.
CONCLUSIONS: Care provided to OHP patients with diabetes compares favorably with national benchmarks. Yet, most OHP patients with diabetes are still not achieving optimal care. Examining predictors of SC may play an important role in further policy development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11213876     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.2.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  8 in total

1.  Receipt of diabetes preventive care among safety net patients associated with differing levels of insurance coverage.

Authors:  Rachel Gold; Jennifer E DeVoe; Patti J McIntire; Jon E Puro; Susan L Chauvie; Amit R Shah
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.657

2.  Electronic health records vs Medicaid claims: completeness of diabetes preventive care data in community health centers.

Authors:  Jennifer E Devoe; Rachel Gold; Patti McIntire; Jon Puro; Susan Chauvie; Charles A Gallia
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Use of chronic care model elements is associated with higher-quality care for diabetes.

Authors:  Paul A Nutting; W Perry Dickinson; L Miriam Dickinson; Candace C Nelson; Diane K King; Benjamin F Crabtree; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Measuring the quality of diabetes care for older american indians and alaska natives.

Authors:  Yvette Roubideaux; Dedra Buchwald; Janette Beals; Denise Middlebrook; Spero Manson; Ben Muneta; Steve Rith-Najarian; Ray Shields; Kelly Acton
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Insurance continuity and receipt of diabetes preventive care in a network of federally qualified health centers.

Authors:  Rachel Gold; Jennifer DeVoe; Amit Shah; Susan Chauvie
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Use of RE-AIM to develop a multi-media facilitation tool for the patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Perry Dickinson; Lawrence Fisher; Steve Christiansen; Deborah J Toobert; Bruce G Bender; L Miriam Dickinson; Bonnie Jortberg; Paul A Estabrooks
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  What are patient factors associated with the quality of diabetes care?: results from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Ki Dong Ko; Bo Hyun Kim; Sang Min Park; Soo In Oh; Chun Sik Um; Dong Wook Shin; Hae Won Lee
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Quality of care: assessment.

Authors:  Allam Appa Rao; Gumpeny Ramachandra Sridhar
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.876

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.