BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Having health insurance is usually associated with better access to care and better health outcomes. For patients receiving care at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), where care is provided regardless of insurance status, the role health insurance status plays in affecting receipt of services is less well understood. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used practice management data from a coalition of FQHCs in Oregon, and linked to Oregon's electronic insurance data, to examine whether receipt of diabetes preventive care services was associated with continuity of insurance coverage among adult FQHC patients receiving diabetes care in 2005. RESULTS: About one-third (32%) of patients with diabetes received a flu vaccination in 2005, 36% an LDL screening, 54% at least 1 HbA1c screening, and 21% a nephropathy screening. Compared with the continuously insured, the continuously uninsured were less likely to receive an LDL screening, a flu vaccination, and/or a nephropathy screening; those with partial coverage were less likely than the continuously insured to receive a flu shot, at least 1 HbA1c screening, or an LDL screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that FQHCs do an excellent job in delivering most services to their uninsured and partially insured patients, but also underscore that for diabetic patients from underserved communities, having both an FQHC medical home and continuous health insurance plays a critical role in receiving optimal chronic disease management. Our study is one of the first to demonstrate how electronic administrative data from a network of FQHCs can be successfully used to gauge the state of healthcare delivery.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Having health insurance is usually associated with better access to care and better health outcomes. For patients receiving care at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), where care is provided regardless of insurance status, the role health insurance status plays in affecting receipt of services is less well understood. RESEARCH DESIGN: We used practice management data from a coalition of FQHCs in Oregon, and linked to Oregon's electronic insurance data, to examine whether receipt of diabetes preventive care services was associated with continuity of insurance coverage among adult FQHC patients receiving diabetes care in 2005. RESULTS: About one-third (32%) of patients with diabetes received a flu vaccination in 2005, 36% an LDL screening, 54% at least 1 HbA1c screening, and 21% a nephropathy screening. Compared with the continuously insured, the continuously uninsured were less likely to receive an LDL screening, a flu vaccination, and/or a nephropathy screening; those with partial coverage were less likely than the continuously insured to receive a flu shot, at least 1 HbA1c screening, or an LDL screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that FQHCs do an excellent job in delivering most services to their uninsured and partially insured patients, but also underscore that for diabeticpatients from underserved communities, having both an FQHC medical home and continuous health insurance plays a critical role in receiving optimal chronic disease management. Our study is one of the first to demonstrate how electronic administrative data from a network of FQHCs can be successfully used to gauge the state of healthcare delivery.
Authors: Marshall H Chin; Sandy Cook; Melinda L Drum; Lei Jin; Myriam Guillen; Catherine A Humikowski; Julie Koppert; James F Harrison; Susan Lippold; Cynthia T Schaefer Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: S M Shortell; J L O'Brien; J M Carman; R W Foster; E F Hughes; H Boerstler; E J O'Connor Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Sarah H Gordon; Yoojin Lee; Chima D Ndumele; Patrick M Vivier; Roee Gutman; Shailender Swaminathan; Emily A Gadbois; Renee R Shield; Amy Jo Haavisto Kind; Amal N Trivedi Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-06-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Steffani R Bailey; Jean P O'Malley; Rachel Gold; John Heintzman; Sonja Likumahuwa; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2013 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Jennifer E DeVoe; Carrie J Tillotson; Sarah E Lesko; Lorraine S Wallace; Heather Angier Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-03-16 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sarah H Gordon; Benjamin D Sommers; Ira Wilson; Omar Galarraga; Amal N Trivedi Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-06-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: John Heintzman; Miguel Marino; Megan Hoopes; Steffani Bailey; Rachel Gold; Courtney Crawford; Stuart Cowburn; Jean O'Malley; Christine Nelson; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-08-11 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Rachel Gold; Jennifer E DeVoe; Patti J McIntire; Jon E Puro; Susan L Chauvie; Amit R Shah Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2012 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Karen M Freund; Alexis P Isabelle; Amresh D Hanchate; Richard L Kalish; Alok Kapoor; Sharon Bak; Rebecca G Mishuris; Swati M Shroff; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2014-02
Authors: Miguel Marino; Steffani R Bailey; Rachel Gold; Megan J Hoopes; Jean P O'Malley; Nathalie Huguet; John Heintzman; Charles Gallia; K John McConnell; Jennifer E DeVoe Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 5.043