Literature DB >> 11213002

The Ipswich childbirth study: one year follow up of alternative methods used in perineal repair.

A Grant1, B Gordon, C Mackrodat, E Fern, A Truesdale, S Ayers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long term implications of four alternative approaches to postpartum perineal repair.
DESIGN: A stratified randomised controlled trial using a 2x2 factorial design.
SETTING: Original recruitment at the Maternity Unit at Ipswich Hospital NHS Trust, a district general hospital, between 1992 and 1994. SAMPLE: Seven hundred and ninety three women who had participated in the Ipswich Childbirth Study--a trial among women who had required repair of episiotomy or first or second degree tears--at least one year previously.
METHODS: Self-completed postal follow up at least one year after recruitment to trial comparing 1. two-stage repair leaving the skin unsutured with standard three-stage repair, and 2. polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut as suture material for the repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure to resume pain-free intercourse; persistent perineal pain; perineum feeling different; resuturing; time to resume pain-free intercourse; and dyspareunia.
RESULTS: Fewer women allocated two-stage repair reported that the perineum felt different (30% versus 40%; RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61 to 0.91; 2P < 0.01); otherwise there were no clear differences between the two methods. Women allocated polyglactin 910 were less likely to have dyspareunia (8% versus 13%; RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.91; 2P = 0.02) and less likely to fail to resume pain-free intercourse (8% versus 14%; RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.87; 2P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: Two-stage repair of perineal trauma leaving the skin unsutured appears to reduce the likelihood of the perineum feeling different from before delivery, in addition to less pain and dyspareunia initially; there were no apparent disadvantages. Polyglactin 910 reduces dyspareunia long term, indicating that the short term benefits of this material over chromic catgut persist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11213002     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  9 in total

Review 1.  Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Therese Dowswell; Khaled Mk Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-06-16

Review 2.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Julie Frohlich; Christine Kettle
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2015-03-10

Review 3.  Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second-degree tears.

Authors:  Christine Kettle; Therese Dowswell; Khaled Mk Ismail
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14

4.  A prospective randomized comparative study of vicryl rapide versus chromic catgut for episiotomy repair.

Authors:  A Bharathi; D B Dharma Reddy; G S Sharath Kote
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-12-24

Review 5.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Chris Kettle; Susan Tohill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-04-11

Review 6.  Perineal care.

Authors:  Chris Kettle; Susan Tohill
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2008-09-24

Review 7.  Patient-reported outcomes and outcome measures in childbirth perineal trauma research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stergios K Doumouchtsis; Jemina Loganathan; John Fahmy; Gabriele Falconi; Maria Rada; Abdullatif Elfituri; Jorge Milhem Haddad; Vasilios Pergialiotis; Cornelia Betschart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  A comparison between early maternal and neonatal complications of restrictive episiotomy and routine episiotomy in primiparous vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Azar Danesh Shahraki; Shahnaz Aram; Soodabeh Pourkabirian; Sepideh Khodaee; Shekofeh Choupannejad
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Features of randomised trials designed by the NPEU Perinatal Trials Service during Adrian Grant's directorship.

Authors:  Diana Elbourne
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.