Literature DB >> 11210863

A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model.

S Chinpairoj1, M D Feldman, J C Saunders, E R Thaler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study is to compare collateral tissue damage and wound healing in incisions created by electro-dissociation and conventional electrosurgery. Conventional electrosurgery has been used as an alternative to the scalpel to improve hemostasis. However, the heat generated by this instrument can cause tissue damage surrounding the incision, limiting its use around nerves and large blood vessels. A new technology, Coblation (Arthrocare Corp., Sunnyvale, CA), uses "electro-dissociation" to achieve similar results by creating charged particles from a conductive medium to make an incision while simultaneously achieving hemostasis. This new approach to electrosurgery may reduce soft tissue damage.
METHODS: Two prospective, matched design experiments were performed. In experiment I, both devices were set at the same electrical power in watts and then used to create an incision on the tongue of rats. In experiment II, the electrical power settings of both devices were adjusted until they created incisions of the same size. Epithelial destruction and collateral tissue damage were measured in histologically prepared tissue in both experiments, and the wound healing process was observed in experiment II at 0, 3, 7, and 14 days after surgery.
RESULTS: The results showed that the electro-dissociation method created significantly less epithelial destruction and collateral tissue damage in both experiments. Granulation tissue formation was also significantly less extensive in the electrodissociation-induced incision after 7 and 14 days of recovery.
CONCLUSIONS: Wound healing may be faster than with conventional electrosurgery if the Coblation device is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11210863     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200102000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  7 in total

1.  Return to theatre in secondary post-tonsillectomy haemorrhage: a comparison of coblation and dissection techniques.

Authors:  Ida Amir; Antonio Belloso; Stephen J Broomfield; Pradeep Morar
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  [Benign prostatic syndrome (BPS). Ablative treatments].

Authors:  O Reich; M Seitz; C Gratzke; B Schlenker; A Bachmann; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Vessel sealing system uvulopalatoplasty versus uvulopalatal flap: a randomized, controlled study of efficacy and adverse effects.

Authors:  Prakobkiat Hirunwiwatkul; Jesada Kanjanaumporn
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Paediatric tonsillectomy: radiofrequency-based plasma dissection compared to cold dissection with sutures.

Authors:  L Di Rienzo Businco; G Coen Tirelli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  Morphologic and histologic outcomes of tongue reduction surgery in an animal model.

Authors:  Jonathan A Perkins; Volodymyr Shcherbatyy; Zi-Jun Liu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Intrapatient Comparison of Coblation versus Electrocautery Tonsillectomy in Children: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Kyu Young Choi; Jae-Cheul Ahn; Chae-Seo Rhee; Doo Hee Han
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Coblation tonsillectomy under surgical microscopy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yufeng Pang; Jingrong Gong; Juan Huang; Shuangzhu He; Hong Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 1.671

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.