Literature DB >> 11207492

Conduct of labor and rupture of the sphincter ani.

C Parnell1, J Langhoff-Roos, H Møller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the conduct of the second stage of labor and delivery technique influences the incidence of rupture of the anal sphincter. MATERIAL AND
METHOD: A total of 1072 primipara delivered vaginally at term at Rigshospitalet in 1998. A questionnaire on prenatal risk factors, conduct of the second stage of labor, and delivery technique was completed by the attending midwife immediately after delivery in 90 cases with rupture of the sphincter and in two subsequent controls (n = 164), matched by use of vacuum extractor and episiotomy.
RESULTS: Partial or total sphincter rupture was found in 8.4% of primipara who delivered vaginally, in 20.9% of those delivered by vacuum extraction, and in 6.4% of those with episiotomy only. The prenatal risk factors--maternal age, birth weight, shoulder dystocia, and edema of the perineum were found to have a statistically significant effect on the incidence of rupture of the sphincter ani. In non-instrumental vaginal deliveries easing of the perineum over the caput as it advanced helped prevent a rupture of the anal sphincter. Vacuum extraction performed with the woman in a semi-recumbant position was associated with an increased risk of rupture of the anal sphincter, whereas attention to the perineum during extraction decreased the risk.
CONCLUSIONS: The significant effect of prenatal risk factors did not explain a correlation between delivery technique and rupture of the sphincter ani. The present study indicates that a reduction in the incidence of sphincter rupture may be accomplished by improved obstetric care: fewer vacuum extractions and improved delivery technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11207492     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0412.2001.080003256.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  Modeling manual perineal protection during vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Magdalena Jansova; Vladimir Kalis; Zdenek Rusavy; Robert Zemcik; Libor Lobovsky; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Hands on or hands off the perineum: a survey of care of the perineum in labour (HOOPS).

Authors:  Ruben Trochez; Malcolm Waterfield; Robert M Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Fecal incontinence: a review of prevalence and obstetric risk factors.

Authors:  Andrea Wang; Marsha Guess; Kathleen Connell; Kenneth Powers; George Lazarou; Magdy Mikhail
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-06-23

4.  Episiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injuries: a case-control study.

Authors:  M Stedenfeldt; J Pirhonen; E Blix; T Wilsgaard; B Vonen; P Øian
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.531

5.  Reducing the incidence of Obstetric Sphincter Injuries using a hands-on technique: an interventional quality improvement project.

Authors:  Ole Bredahl Rasmussen; Annika Yding; Jacob Anh Ø; Charlotte Sander Andersen; Jane Boris
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2016-12-19

6.  Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries among Women Delivering at a Tertiary Hospital in Southwestern Uganda.

Authors:  Mahad Ali; Richard Migisha; Joseph Ngonzi; Joy Muhumuza; Ronald Mayanja; Jolly Joe Lapat; Wasswa Salongo; Musa Kayondo
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2020-05-14

Review 7.  Mediolateral/lateral episiotomy with operative vaginal delivery and the risk reduction of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Adanna Okeahialam; Ka Woon Wong; Swati Jha; Abdul H Sultan; Ranee Thakar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 1.932

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.