Literature DB >> 11205329

A new class of errant DNA polymerases provides candidates for somatic hypermutation.

B Tippin1, M F Goodman.   

Abstract

The mechanism of somatic hypermutation of the immunoglobulin genes remains a mystery after nearly 30 years of intensive research in the field. While many clues to the process have been discovered in terms of the genetic elements required in the immunoglobulin genes, the key enzymatic players that mediate the introduction of mutations into the variable region are unknown. The recent wave of newly discovered eukaryotic DNA polymerases have given a fresh supply of potential candidates and a renewed vigour in the search for the elusive mutator factor governing affinity maturation. In this paper, we discuss the relevant genetic and biochemical evidence known to date regarding both somatic hypermutation and the new DNA polymerases and address how the two fields can be brought together to identify the strongest candidates for further study. In particular we discuss evidence for the in vitro biochemical misincorporation properties of human Rad30B/Pol iota and how it compares to the in vivo somatic hypermutation spectra.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11205329      PMCID: PMC1087690          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  53 in total

1.  Both DNA strands of antibody genes are hypermutation targets.

Authors:  C Milstein; M S Neuberger; R Staden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-07-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The role of promoter-intron interactions in directing hypermutation.

Authors:  D B Winter; N Sattar; P J Gearhart
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Evolution of somatic hypermutation and gene conversion in adaptive immunity.

Authors:  M Diaz; M F Flajnik
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 4.  Monitoring and interpreting the intrinsic features of somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  M S Neuberger; M R Ehrenstein; N Klix; C J Jolly; J Yélamos; C Rada; C Milstein
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 5.  Transcriptional regulation of B-cell differentiation.

Authors:  T Reya; R Grosschedl
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.486

6.  Roles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis.

Authors:  M Tang; P Pham; X Shen; J S Taylor; M O'Donnell; R Woodgate; M F Goodman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-04-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The absence of the transcription activator TFE3 impairs activation of B cells in vivo.

Authors:  K Merrell; S Wells; A Henderson; J Gorman; F Alt; A Stall; K Calame
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein.

Authors:  J R Nelson; C W Lawrence; D C Hinkle
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-08-22       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  B lymphocytes of xeroderma pigmentosum or Cockayne syndrome patients with inherited defects in nucleotide excision repair are fully capable of somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes.

Authors:  N Kim; K Kage; F Matsuda; M P Lefranc; U Storb
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1997-08-04       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Biochemical basis of SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: reconstitution of in vitro lesion bypass dependent on the UmuD'2C mutagenic complex and RecA protein.

Authors:  M Tang; I Bruck; R Eritja; J Turner; E G Frank; R Woodgate; M O'Donnell; M F Goodman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Expression of error-prone polymerases in BL2 cells activated for Ig somatic hypermutation.

Authors:  V Poltoratsky; C J Woo; B Tippin; A Martin; M F Goodman; M D Scharff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-06-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  ASFV DNA polymerse X is extremely error-prone under diverse assay conditions and within multiple DNA sequence contexts.

Authors:  Brandon J Lamarche; Sandeep Kumar; Ming-Daw Tsai
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 3.  Mismatch-mediated error prone repair at the immunoglobulin genes.

Authors:  Richard Chahwan; Winfried Edelmann; Matthew D Scharff; Sergio Roa
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 6.529

4.  Acquisition of Genetic Aberrations by Activation-Induced Cytidine Deaminase (AID) during Inflammation-Associated Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Atsushi Takai; Hiroyuki Marusawa; Tsutomu Chiba
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.