Literature DB >> 11204103

Entropy and variability discrimination.

M E Young1, E A Wasserman.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined college students' discrimination of complex visual displays that involved different degrees of variability or "entropy." Displays depicted 16 black and white line drawings of various types (e.g., a brain, a clock, a hand); the participants were required to classify a display in terms of its variability (e.g., a low-variability display contains many identical items, whereas a high-variability display contains few identical items). The participants' accuracy and reaction time scores on a 2-alternative forced-choice discrimination disclosed that people can and do use entropy to classify different levels of visual display variability. Individuals differed in their use of absolute rather than relative entropy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11204103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  Evidence for a conceptual account of same-different discrimination learning in the pigeon.

Authors:  M E Young; E A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory.

Authors:  Allen Neuringer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  The pigeon's discrimination of visual entropy: a logarithmic function.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-11

4.  Probability detection mechanisms and motor learning.

Authors:  O V Lungu; T Wächter; T Liu; D T Willingham; J Ashe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Variations on variability: effects of display composition on same-different discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Edward A Wasserman; Michael E Young
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Same/different discrimination learning with trial-unique stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel I Brooks; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

7.  No evidence for feature binding by pigeons in a change detection task.

Authors:  Olga F Lazareva; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Effects of stimulus size and spatial organization on pigeons' conditional same-different discrimination.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Recurrent, robust and scalable patterns underlie human approach and avoidance.

Authors:  Byoung Woo Kim; David N Kennedy; Joseph Lehár; Myung Joo Lee; Anne J Blood; Sang Lee; Roy H Perlis; Jordan W Smoller; Robert Morris; Maurizio Fava; Hans C Breiter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of number of items and visual display variability on same-different discrimination behavior.

Authors:  Leyre Castro; Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.