Literature DB >> 11200019

Quantitative gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging with 201Tl: an assessment of the limitations.

G A Wright1, M McDade, W Keeble, W Martin, I Hutton.   

Abstract

Gated SPECT (GSPECT) perfusion imaging has been increasing in popularity both with 99Tc(m) agents and 201Tl. However, both higher activities than administered in the UK and multi-headed cameras are often used. The aim of this study was to assess GSPECT imaging using lower activities of 201Tl with a single-headed camera. Seventy patients underwent stress and redistribution GSPECT imaging after a mean injected activity of 62 +/- 7 MBq 201Tl. These patients also underwent radionuclide ventriculography (RNVG) imaging. The Cedars Sinai Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS) package was used to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from the GSPECT studies. Comparison of ejection fractions calculated using GSPECT with those calculated using RNVG yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.70 for the stress studies and 0.71 for the redistribution studies. The width of the mean 95% prediction interval ranged from 22 to 74 percentage points for the stress studies and 22 to 86 percentage points for the redistribution studies. Ejection fractions calculated from stress and redistribution GSPECT studies showed a correlation of 0.80 with a mean 95% prediction interval of 42.6 +/- 0.4 percentage points. In conclusion, left ventricular ejection fractions calculated using the QGS algorithm from 201Tl GSPECT studies are inadequate for use in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11200019     DOI: 10.1097/00006231-200012000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  5 in total

1.  Comparative value of ECG-gated blood pool SPET and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET in the assessment of global systolic left ventricular function.

Authors:  Doumit Daou; Didier Vilain; Patrice Colin; Rachida Lebtahi; Thierry Fourme; Carlos Coaguila; Abdel Benada; Ilana Idy-Peretti; Michel Slama; Dominique Le Guludec
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-04       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Individual measurements may not closely follow average tendencies: the paradigm of nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  Efstratios Moralidis; Georgios Arsos; Dimitrios Boundas; Konstantinos Karakatsanis
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Differential effects of pharmacologic stressors: more than meets the eye.

Authors:  Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Factors affecting accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated tl-201 myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Moonsun Pai; You-Jung Yang; Ki Chun Im; Il Ki Hong; Sung Cheol Yun; Duk-Hyun Kang; Jae-Kwan Song; Dae Hyuk Moon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Left ventricular aneurysm in the scope of gated perfusion SPECT: accuracy of detection and ejection fraction calculation.

Authors:  Fevziye Canbaz; Tarik Basoglu; Kenan Durna; Sibel Ucak Semirgin; Sevgi Canbaz
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 2.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.