Literature DB >> 11198477

Computer-aided epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions: the value of clinical data for the classification process.

M Binder1, H Kittler, S Dreiseitl, H Ganster, K Wolff, H Pehamberger.   

Abstract

Early melanoma is often difficult to differentiate from benign pigmented skin lesions (PSLs). Digital epiluminescence microscopy (DELM) and automated image analysis could represent possible aids for inexperienced clinicians. We designed an automated computerized image analysis system that has the potential for use as an additional tool for the differentiation of melanoma from dysplastic naevi and common naevi. The PC-based pilot system was attached to a common DELM system as the image source. Digital images of PSLs were automatically segmented and a panel of 107 morphological parameters were measured. Additionally, seven clinical parameters were evaluated and used as an additional source of information. Neural networks were then trained to distinguish melanoma from benign PSLs. One class of networks was trained solely based on the morphometric features, whereas the second class of networks was trained on the combination of morphometric and clinical features. The automatic segmentation algorithm was correct in 96% of cases. Using three-way receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, for networks trained solely on morphometric features the volume under surface (VUS) was 0.617 (SD 0.036). The performance was significantly better for networks trained on the combination of both morphometric and clinical features (VUS = 0.682, SD 0.035). In a dichotomous model, distinguishing benign lesion (common naevi + dysplastic naevi) from melanoma, the area under the curve (AUC) from two-way ROC analysis was 0.942 (SD 0.018) for networks trained solely on morphometric features and 0.968 (SD 0.012) for those trained on the combination of clinical and morphometric data (P= NS). Automated feature extraction from PSLs and the training of neural networks as classifiers has thus shown satisfactory performance in a large scale experiment. The addition of clinical data significantly increases the diagnostic performance for distinguishing three classes of lesions (i.e. common naevi, dysplastic naevi and melanoma). Such integrated systems hold promise as a decision aid for the diagnosis of PSLs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11198477     DOI: 10.1097/00008390-200012000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Melanoma Res        ISSN: 0960-8931            Impact factor:   3.599


  9 in total

1.  [Dermatoscopy-30 years after the First Consensus Conference].

Authors:  Andreas Blum; Friedrich A Bahmer; Jürgen Bauer; Ralph P Braun; Brigitte Coras-Stepanek; Teresa Deinlein; Thomas Eigentler; Christine Fink; Claus Garbe; Holger A Haenssle; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Harald Kittler; Jürgen Kreusch; Hubert Pehamberger; Hans Schulz; H Peter Soyer; Wilhelm Stolz; Philipp Tschandl; Iris Zalaudek
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Expert-Level Diagnosis of Nonpigmented Skin Cancer by Combined Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Philipp Tschandl; Cliff Rosendahl; Bengu Nisa Akay; Giuseppe Argenziano; Andreas Blum; Ralph P Braun; Horacio Cabo; Jean-Yves Gourhant; Jürgen Kreusch; Aimilios Lallas; Jan Lapins; Ashfaq Marghoob; Scott Menzies; Nina Maria Neuber; John Paoli; Harold S Rabinovitz; Christoph Rinner; Alon Scope; H Peter Soyer; Christoph Sinz; Luc Thomas; Iris Zalaudek; Harald Kittler
Journal:  JAMA Dermatol       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 10.282

Review 3.  Current and emerging technologies in melanoma diagnosis: the state of the art.

Authors:  Estee L Psaty; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  Clin Dermatol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.541

4.  Results of the 2016 International Skin Imaging Collaboration International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging challenge: Comparison of the accuracy of computer algorithms to dermatologists for the diagnosis of melanoma from dermoscopic images.

Authors:  Michael A Marchetti; Noel C F Codella; Stephen W Dusza; David A Gutman; Brian Helba; Aadi Kalloo; Nabin Mishra; Cristina Carrera; M Emre Celebi; Jennifer L DeFazio; Natalia Jaimes; Ashfaq A Marghoob; Elizabeth Quigley; Alon Scope; Oriol Yélamos; Allan C Halpern
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 11.527

5.  Computer-assisted diagnosis techniques (dermoscopy and spectroscopy-based) for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Yemisi Takwoingi; Jacqueline Dinnes; Naomi Chuchu; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Rubeta N Matin; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Alana Durack; Susan O'Connell; Matthew D Gardiner; Jeffrey Bamber; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Application of an Interactive Diagnosis Ranking Algorithm in a Simulated Vignette-based Environment for General Dermatology.

Authors:  Antonia Wesinger; Elisabeth Riedl; Harald Kittler; Philipp Tschandl
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 7.  Integrating Patient Data Into Skin Cancer Classification Using Convolutional Neural Networks: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Julia Höhn; Achim Hekler; Eva Krieghoff-Henning; Jakob Nikolas Kather; Jochen Sven Utikal; Friedegund Meier; Frank Friedrich Gellrich; Axel Hauschild; Lars French; Justin Gabriel Schlager; Kamran Ghoreschi; Tabea Wilhelm; Heinz Kutzner; Markus Heppt; Sebastian Haferkamp; Wiebke Sondermann; Dirk Schadendorf; Bastian Schilling; Roman C Maron; Max Schmitt; Tanja Jutzi; Stefan Fröhling; Daniel B Lipka; Titus Josef Brinker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Strategies for early recognition of cutaneous melanoma-present and future.

Authors:  Franziska Brehmer; Martina Ulrich; Holger A Haenssle
Journal:  Dermatol Pract Concept       Date:  2012-07-31

9.  Computer-aided diagnosis of skin lesions using conventional digital photography: a reliability and feasibility study.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Chang; Adam Huang; Chung-Yi Yang; Chien-Hung Lee; Yin-Chun Chen; Tian-Yau Wu; Gwo-Shing Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.