Literature DB >> 11198235

Recognizing depth-rotated objects: a review of recent research and theory.

I Biederman1.   

Abstract

Many of the phenomena of object classification can be derived from a representation specifying a nonaccidental characterization of an object's parts (geons) and relations, termed a geon structural description (GSD). Such a representation: (a) enables the facile recognition of depth-rotated objects, even when they are novel, (b) provides the information that is employed not only to distinguish basic-level but also highly similar members of subordinate-level classes, and (c) enables mapping onto verbal and object-reasoning structures. Recent psychophysical and neural investigations of object recognition have provided additional support to this theory of object representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11198235     DOI: 10.1163/156856800741063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  17 in total

1.  On the three-quarter view advantage of familiar object recognition.

Authors:  Kohei Nonose; Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-09-21

2.  Three-quarter views are subjectively good because object orientation is uncertain.

Authors:  Ryosuke Niimi; Kazuhiko Yokosawa
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

3.  Generalization between canonical and non-canonical views in object recognition.

Authors:  Tandra Ghose; Zili Liu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Functional compartmentalization and viewpoint generalization within the macaque face-processing system.

Authors:  Winrich A Freiwald; Doris Y Tsao
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Sounds exaggerate visual shape.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Laura Ortega; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-05-25

6.  Simultaneous shape repulsion and global assimilation in the perception of aspect ratio.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Using the reassignment procedure to test object representation in pigeons and people.

Authors:  Jessie J Peissig; Yasuo Nagasaka; Michael E Young; Edward A Wasserman; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Developmental changes in visual object recognition between 18 and 24 months of age.

Authors:  Alfredo F Pereira; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2009-01

9.  Object representations in ventral and dorsal visual streams: fMRI repetition effects depend on attention and part-whole configuration.

Authors:  Volker Thoma; Richard N Henson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The role of perceptual load in object recognition.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie; Zhicheng Lin; Nahid Zokaei; Volker Thoma
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.