Literature DB >> 1119789

How should the common bile duct be explored?

A L Peel, J B Bourke, J Hermon-Taylor, A D MacLean, C V Mann, H D Ritchie.   

Abstract

An attempt has been made to find which of 3 operations currently in use for exploring the bile ducts gave the best clinical results. For this purpose 3 series of consecutive patients treated at The London Hospital over a 12-year period have been studied retrospectively. The operations used were as follows: (1) conventional supraduodenal choledochotomy; (2) transduodenal biliary sphincterotomy; and (3) a combined approach. The mortality in the supraduodenal series was 4 (4%) of 101 patients and in the transduodenal series 2 (2.4%) of 82 patients. Both routes were used in 26 patients, of whom 2 (7.7%) died. Early complications were commoner after choledochotomy than after biliary sphincterotomy, but when both procedures were combined the incidence was higher still. Late complications were also more frequent after both the supraduodenal and the combined approach, residual or recurrent stones and cholangitis being 6 times more common than after sphincterotomy alone. Postexploratory cholangiography, however, was not used routinly in the supraduodenal series and might conceivably have reduced this factor further, but not below 3. Stenosis occurred in one patient after choledochotomy and in one patient after the combined operation but not after sphincterotomy alone. In this study, therefore, transduodenal biliary sphincterotomy gave the lowest mortality and morbidity. With the combined procedure, however, the mortality and morbidity were much higher than after either method alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1119789      PMCID: PMC2388527     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  17 in total

1.  [Results & remote sequelae of section of Oddi's sphincter].

Authors:  Y J LONGUET
Journal:  Mem Acad Chir (Paris)       Date:  1959 Mar 4-18

2.  [Surgery of choledochal lithiasis without drainage, with total sphincteroplasty].

Authors: 
Journal:  Mem Acad Chir (Paris)       Date:  1959 Mar 4-18

3.  External choledochoduodenostomy. An evaluation of 125 cases.

Authors:  W M CAPPER
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1961-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Surgery of the biliary tract.

Authors:  A D WRIGHT
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1960-12       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis and necrosis associated with choledochal sphincterotomy.

Authors:  W WALTERS; L TAMA; J MAGISANO
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1961-08       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  [The time of appearance of sulfobromophthalein in the bile; new test for diagnosis of incomplete icterus due to retention and anicteric blocking of the common bile duct].

Authors:  J CAROLI; Y TANASOGLU
Journal:  Sem Hop       Date:  1953-02-15

7.  Choledochometry and trans-duodenal sphincterotomy.

Authors:  R R Hunter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1972-10       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Infective complications of choledochotomy with T-tube drainage.

Authors:  M R Keighley; N G Graham
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Technique of transduodenal exploration of the common bile duct. Duodenoscopic appearances after biliary sphincterotomy.

Authors:  A L Peel; J Hermon-Taylor; H D Ritchie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  [Long-term results of sphincterotomy of Oddi's sphincter].

Authors:  J Moreaux; A S Teixeira
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1966-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Sphincter patency and hepatic BSP uptake after biliary sphincterotomy.

Authors:  A L Peel; H B Delvin; H D Ritchie
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the young patient: is there cause for concern?

Authors:  T C Tham; D L Carr-Locke; J S Collins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Endoscopic management of bile duct stones; (apples and oranges).

Authors:  P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Prospective randomised study of preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus surgery alone for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; D L Carr-Locke; D P Fossard
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-02-21

5.  Morbidity of simple cholecystectomy and cholecystectomy with transduodenal sphincteroplasty.

Authors:  R M Antrum; R Hall
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Transduodenal exploration of the common bile duct in a district general hospital.

Authors:  D J Cave-Bigley; P Aukland; J F Kane; E G Hardy
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Biliary sequelae of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  C Greenfield; P Cleland; R Dick; S Masters; J A Summerfield; S Sherlock
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy and gall stone removal.

Authors:  F O'Connor
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1983
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.