Literature DB >> 11194306

Analysis of selection effects in New York City's Medicaid managed care population prior to mandatory enrollment.

J Billings1, T Mijanovich, T Frenkel, J Cantor.   

Abstract

It is becoming increasingly apparent that over the next several years the majority of Medicaid patients in many states will become enrolled in managed care plans, some voluntarily, but most as the result of mandatory initiatives. An important issue related to this development is the extent to which this movement to managed care is accompanied by serious selection effects, either across the board during the phase in or among individual plans or plan types with full-scale implementation. This paper examines selection effects in New York City between 1993 and 1997 during the voluntary enrollment period prior to implementation of mandatory enrollment pursuant to a Section 1115 waiver. No substantial selection bias was documented between patients entering managed care and those remaining in the fee-for-service system among the largest rate groups, although some selection effect was found among plans and plan types (with investor-owned plans enrolling patients with lower prior utilization and expenses).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11194306      PMCID: PMC3456759          DOI: 10.1007/BF02344027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  6 in total

1.  Reversal of fortune: commercial HMOs in the Medicaid market.

Authors:  M J McCue; R E Hurley; D A Draper; M Jurgensen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The risk-adjustment debate.

Authors:  R Kuttner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Patient self-selection in HMOs.

Authors:  G R Wilensky; L F Rossiter
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Academic managed care organizations and adverse selection under Medicaid managed care in Tennessee.

Authors:  J E Bailey; D L Van Brunt; D M Mirvis; S McDaniel; C R Spears; C F Chang; D R Schaberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Who enrolled in a state program for the uninsured: was there adverse selection?

Authors:  P Diehr; C W Madden; D P Martin; D L Patrick; M Mayers; P Char; S Skillman; A Cheadle; P Fishman; G Hoare
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Selection bias in health maintenance organizations: analysis of recent evidence.

Authors:  F J Hellinger
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1987
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.