Literature DB >> 11194247

A comparison of two diabetic foot ulcer classification systems: the Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems.

S O Oyibo1, E B Jude, I Tarawneh, H C Nguyen, L B Harkless, A J Boulton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study the following two ulcer classification systems were applied to new foot ulcers to compare them as predictors of outcome: the Wagner (grade) and the University of Texas (LT) (grade and stage) wound classification systems. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ulcer size, appearance, clinical evidence of infection, ischemia, and neuropathy at presentation were recorded, and patients were followed up until healing or for 6 months.
RESULTS: Of 194 patients with new foot ulcers, 67.0% were neuropathic, 26.3% were neuroischemic, 1.0% were ischemic, and 5.7% had no identified underlying factors. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) ulcer size at presentation was 1.5 cm2 (0.6-4.0). Lower-limb amputations were performed for 15% of ulcers, whereas 65% healed [median (IQR) healing time 5 (3-10) weeks] and 16% were not healed at study termination; 4% of patients died. Wagner grade (P < 0.0001), and UT grade (P < 0.0001) and stage (P < 0.001) showed positive trends with increased number of amputations. For UT stage, the risk of amputation increased with infection both alone (odds ratio [OR] = 11.1, P < 0.0001) and in combination with ischemia (OR = 14.7, P < 0.0001), but not significantly with ischemia alone (OR = 4.6, P = 0.09). Healing times were not significantly different for each grade of the Wagner (P = 0.1) or the UT system (P = 0.07), but there was a significant stepwise increase in healing time with each stage of the UT system (P < 0.05), and stage predicted healing (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Increasing stage, regardless of grade, is associated with increased risk of amputation and prolonged ulcer healing time. The UT system's inclusion of stage makes it a better predictor of outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11194247     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.1.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  94 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of two methods for wound bed area measurement.

Authors:  Sven Van Poucke; Roald Nelissen; Philippe Jorens; Yves Vander Haeghen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 2.  Dressings for treating foot ulcers in people with diabetes: an overview of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Lihua Wu; Gill Norman; Jo C Dumville; Susan O'Meara; Sally E M Bell-Syer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-14

Review 3.  Evidence-based treatment of chronic leg ulcers.

Authors:  Birgit Kahle; Hans-Joachim Hermanns; Georg Gallenkemper
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 5.594

4.  Comparing the Meggitt-Wagner and the University of Texas wound classification systems for diabetic foot ulcers: inter-observer analyses.

Authors:  Trientje B Santema; Ellie A Lenselink; Ron Balm; Dirk T Ubbink
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Updates on Diabetic Foot and Charcot Osteopathic Arthropathy.

Authors:  Brian M Schmidt; Crystal M Holmes
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 6.  Classification of wounds of the diabetic foot.

Authors:  D G Armstrong; E J Peters
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.810

7.  From ulcer to infection: an update on clinical practice and adjunctive treatments of diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  C Abad; N Safdar
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Understanding diabetic foot.

Authors:  Sharad P Pendsey
Journal:  Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries       Date:  2010-04

9.  Attenuation of flightless I improves wound healing and enhances angiogenesis in a murine model of type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Nadira Ruzehaji; Zlatko Kopecki; Elizabeth Melville; Sarah L Appleby; Claudine S Bonder; Ruth M Arkell; Robert Fitridge; Allison J Cowin
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Independent risk factors for amputation in diabetic foot.

Authors:  Abolfazl Shojaiefard; Zhamak Khorgami; Bagher Larijani
Journal:  Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries       Date:  2008-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.