Literature DB >> 11193958

Use of temporal envelope cues by children with developmental dyslexia.

C Lorenzi1, A Dumont, C Füllgrabe.   

Abstract

This study evaluates the ability to process auditory temporal-envelope cues in a group of 6 children with dyslexia (mean age: 10;10 years;months). To address this issue, we measured (a) temporal modulation transfer functions (TMTFs), that is, the detection thresholds of sinusoidal amplitude modulation (SAM) applied to a white noise carrier, as a function of modulation frequency, fm (fm was 4, 16, 64, 256, and 1,024 Hz) and (b) identification performance for vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) stimuli over 5 sessions. VCV stimuli were either unprocessed or digitally processed to remove the original spectral information, resulting in a time-varying speech envelope amplitude modulating a noise carrier. The same tests were conducted in 6 normal control children (mean age: 11;6 years;months) and 6 normal control adults (mean age: 24;8 years;months). SAM thresholds were similar in normal children and adults. For both normal groups, TMTFs were low pass in shape and showed low between-listener variability. TMTFs measured in children with dyslexia showed higher between-listener variability: TMTFs were band pass in 2 children, flat in 1 child, and low pass in the 3 others. Overall, SAM thresholds were higher in children with dyslexia than in normal children at fm = 4 and 1,024 Hz. Unprocessed-speech identification performance was nearly perfect in normal children and adults, and impaired in children with dyslexia. "Speech-envelope noise" identification performance was poorer in normal children and children with dyslexia than in normal adults. Performance improved across sessions in normal children and adults, but remained constant in children with dyslexia. Compared to normal children, children with dyslexia showed poorer reception of voicing, manner, and place of articulation for unprocessed speech and poorer reception of voicing for "speech-envelope noise." Taken together, these results support the hypothesis that some children with dyslexia may show abnormal auditory temporal-envelope processing. Such a deficit, in turn, may explain the difficulties of children with dyslexia with speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11193958     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4306.1367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  21 in total

1.  Perceptual learning and generalization resulting from training on an auditory amplitude-modulation detection task.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Separable developmental trajectories for the abilities to detect auditory amplitude and frequency modulation.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Andrew T Sabin; Beverly A Wright
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Sensitivity of school-aged children to pitch-related cues.

Authors:  Mickael L D Deroche; Danielle J Zion; Jaclyn R Schurman; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Deficits in speech perception predict language learning impairment.

Authors:  Johannes C Ziegler; Catherine Pech-Georgel; Florence George; F-Xavier Alario; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Revisiting the "enigma" of musicians with dyslexia: Auditory sequencing and speech abilities.

Authors:  Jennifer Zuk; Paula Bishop-Liebler; Ola Ozernov-Palchik; Emma Moore; Katie Overy; Graham Welch; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-04

6.  Sensitivity to structure in the speech signal by children with speech sound disorder and reading disability.

Authors:  Erin Phinney Johnson; Bruce F Pennington; Joanna H Lowenstein; Susan Nittrouer
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.288

7.  Perceptual organization of speech signals by children with and without dyslexia.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-05-21

8.  Discriminatory validity of dyslexia screening tasks in French school age children.

Authors:  Guylaine Le Jan; Régine Le Bouquin Jeannès; Nathalie Costet; Gérard Faucon
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2007

9.  Knockdown of the dyslexia-associated gene Kiaa0319 impairs temporal responses to speech stimuli in rat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  T M Centanni; A B Booker; A M Sloan; F Chen; B J Maher; R S Carraway; N Khodaparast; R Rennaker; J J LoTurco; M P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Amplitude Modulation Detection in Children with a History of Temporary Conductive Hearing Loss Remains Impaired for Years After Restoration of Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Margo McKenna Benoit; Mark Orlando; Kenneth Henry; Paul Allen
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.