Literature DB >> 11187358

Assessing the implementation of clinical process innovations: a cross-case comparison.

L A Savitz1, A D Kaluzny.   

Abstract

Clinical process innovations (CPI) are central to the ability of organizations to negotiate the challenges of cost containment and quality improvement, yet many CPI have not met expectations. Perhaps most alarming is that the dissemination and implementation of CPI is not well understood. This is the second of two articles addressing the dissemination and use of CPI in integrated delivery systems. This article discusses those factors that have been identified as either facilitating or impeding the various stages in implementing CPI and suggests some intervention strategies to enhance opportunities for continuous CPI. Identifying the process and the factors driving the implementation of CPI is only part of the challenge. The development of CPI adequate to fully meet current challenges will require managers to re-examine existing paradigms and values influencing their actions to date. Within this context, the necessary staging of the innovation process within the life cycle, developing partnerships both within and outside the organization to gather the necessary resources and support, and multidimensional performance monitoring and feedback can prepare organizations and managers to better face the reality of managing the innovation process.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11187358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Manag        ISSN: 1096-9012


  4 in total

1.  Enabling a learning healthcare system with automated computer protocols that produce replicable and personalized clinician actions.

Authors:  Alan H Morris; Brian Stagg; Michael Lanspa; James Orme; Terry P Clemmer; Lindell K Weaver; Frank Thomas; Colin K Grissom; Ellie Hirshberg; Thomas D East; Carrie Jane Wallace; Michael P Young; Dean F Sittig; Antonio Pesenti; Michela Bombino; Eduardo Beck; Katherine A Sward; Charlene Weir; Shobha S Phansalkar; Gordon R Bernard; B Taylor Thompson; Roy Brower; Jonathon D Truwit; Jay Steingrub; R Duncan Hite; Douglas F Willson; Jerry J Zimmerman; Vinay M Nadkarni; Adrienne Randolph; Martha A Q Curley; Christopher J L Newth; Jacques Lacroix; Michael S D Agus; Kang H Lee; Bennett P deBoisblanc; R Scott Evans; Dean K Sorenson; Anthony Wong; Michael V Boland; David W Grainger; Willard H Dere; Alan S Crandall; Julio C Facelli; Stanley M Huff; Peter J Haug; Ulrike Pielmeier; Stephen E Rees; Dan S Karbing; Steen Andreassen; Eddy Fan; Roberta M Goldring; Kenneth I Berger; Beno W Oppenheimer; E Wesley Ely; Ognjen Gajic; Brian Pickering; David A Schoenfeld; Irena Tocino; Russell S Gonnering; Peter J Pronovost; Lucy A Savitz; Didier Dreyfuss; Arthur S Slutsky; James D Crapo; Derek Angus; Michael R Pinsky; Brent James; Donald Berwick
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  A cluster randomized trial to assess the effect of clinical pathways for patients with stroke: results of the clinical pathways for effective and appropriate care study.

Authors:  Massimiliano Panella; Sara Marchisio; Romeo Brambilla; Kris Vanhaecht; Francesco Di Stanislao
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 8.775

3.  The role of chief executive officers in a quality improvement : a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anam Parand; Sue Dopson; Charles Vincent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: a case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes.

Authors:  Susan R Kirsh; Renée H Lawrence; David C Aron
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 7.327

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.