Literature DB >> 11180075

Whole body positron emission tomography in the treatment of Hodgkin disease.

B Hueltenschmidt1, M L Sautter-Bihl, O Lang, F D Maul, J Fischer, H G Mergenthaler, H Bihl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In Hodgkin disease (HD), accurate assessment of the extent of disease is essential because it provides the basis for different treatment strategies. In addition to conventional imaging methods (CIM), positron emission tomography with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) may permit reliable differentiation between lymphoma and nonmalignant tissue and thus improve determination of the stage of the disease. The aim of the current study was to assess the clinical value of FDG-PET for primary staging, treatment monitoring, and assessment in a suspected case of recurrent HD.
METHODS: Eighty-one patients with HD underwent 106 FDG-PET studies using a dedicated whole body PET ring scanner. In 25 patients PET was part of the primary staging, 63 PET studies were undertaken for treatment monitoring after the completion of treatment, and in 18 patients PET was performed in cases of suspected recurrence of HD. PET scans were compared with CIM and verified histologically and/or by follow-up evaluation (mean follow-up duration, 20.4 months).
RESULTS: With regard to primary staging, in a patient to patient analysis, both PET scans and CIM were positive (i.e., showed pathologic foci indicative of HD) in 24 of 25 cases. In a staging-relevant lesion to lesion analysis, accuracy in the determination of the stage of disease was 96% for PET versus 56% for CIM. PET led to a lower stage classification in 28% and a higher stage classification in 12% of cases, compared with the stage assumed with CIM. With regard to treatment monitoring, PET showed an accuracy of 91% compared with 62% for CIM. The negative predictive value of PET was 96%. With regard to suspected recurrence, PET findings were true-positive in 10 of 12 PET scans and true-negative in 5 of 6 PET scans, resulting in accuracy of 83%, which compares favorably with the accuracy rate of 56% for CIM.
CONCLUSIONS: It may be concluded that FDG-PET is capable of determining the stage of HD with great accuracy and is capable of correctly detecting manifestations of HD in treatment monitoring and cases of suspected recurrence, in which CIM occasionally result in equivocal findings. The results of the current study suggest that FDG-PET should become a routine tool in the staging/restaging of HD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11180075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  20 in total

1.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

Review 2.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  FDG PET in response evaluation of bulky masses in paediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients enrolled in the Italian AIEOP-LH2004 trial.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Maurizio Mascarin; Arnoldo Piccardo; Angelo Castello; Caterina Elia; Luca Guerra; Eugenio Borsatti; Alessandra Sala; Alessandra Todesco; Pietro Zucchetta; Piero Farruggia; Angelina Cistaro; Salvatore Buffardi; Patrizia Bertolini; Maurizio Bianchi; Maria Luisa Moleti; Feisal Bunkheila; Paolo Indolfi; Franca Fagioli; Alberto Garaventa; Roberta Burnelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Use of FDG-PET to monitor response to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in patients with lymphomas.

Authors:  N George Mikhaeel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET and standard procedures for the pretreatment staging of children and adolescents with Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Edita Kabickova; David Sumerauer; Eliska Cumlivska; Eva Drahokoupilova; Michaela Nekolna; Marketa Chanova; Marie Hladikova; Roman Kodet; Otakar Belohlavek
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Current status of PET/CT in the diagnosis and follow up of lymphomas.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel
Journal:  Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter       Date:  2011

7.  Early therapy monitoring with FDG-PET in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Tatsuo Torizuka; Fumitoshi Nakamura; Toshihiko Kanno; Masami Futatsubashi; Etsuji Yoshikawa; Hiroyuki Okada; Masahide Kobayashi; Yasuomi Ouchi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  PET and restaging of malignant lymphoma including residual masses and relapse.

Authors:  S N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Role of PET/CT in malignant pediatric lymphoma.

Authors:  Raef Riad; Walid Omar; Magdy Kotb; Magdy Hafez; Iman Sidhom; Manal Zamzam; Iman Zaky; Hussein Abdel-Dayem
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Current role of FDG PET/CT in lymphoma.

Authors:  Lale Kostakoglu; Bruce D Cheson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.