Literature DB >> 11179565

Effects of density on perching behavior of broiler chickens.

R Pettit-Riley1.   

Abstract

Exercise through perching has been suggested as a way to reduce the impact of leg problems in broiler chickens. It is possible that higher stocking densities may motivate birds to perch more, and perhaps reduce some of the detrimental effects to broiler health seen with high stocking densities. The goal of this research was to investigate the effects of density (10, 15, and 20birds/m(2)) and perch design on the frequency of perch utilization. Mixed sex broilers were assigned to 36 pens in a four perch treatmentxthree density factorial with three replications for each treatment/density combination in a randomized complete block design. Pens were assigned to one of four perch treatments: control (no perches), horizontal (three horizontal perches), angled (three 10 degrees angled perches), or mixed angle (one horizontal, one 10 degrees angled, and one 20 degrees angled perch), at each of the three densities. The results show that although the frequency of perch use was low, (2.6%+/-0.15), significant preferences were clear. Perching frequency was significantly higher when birds were raised at stocking densities of 15 (2.88+/-0.303) or 20birds/m(2) (2.76+/-0.211), as opposed to 10birds/m(2) (2.10+/-0.209) as indicated by a marginally significant main effect (p<0.0597), and a significant linear effect (P<0.0427). The birds used the horizontal perches the most, followed by 10 degrees angled and mixed angle perch treatments with decreasing frequency. An effect of age was found, in that perching increased during the first 4 weeks, and dropped off significantly at the end of the rearing period for all perch treatments. In general, perches closest to the hallway or outside of the house were used more than perches in the middle of the pen. Preferential use of the highest section of the 10 degrees angled perches was also found. The applied perch treatments or densities did not significantly affect final body weight or feed conversion. Percent mortality due to heat stress showed a significant increase with density, while mortality not caused by heat stress did not change with perch treatment or density.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11179565     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00174-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  8 in total

1.  Responses of male broiler chickens from two genetic groups to different stocking densities in a semi-arid subtropical environment.

Authors:  Kow Benyi; Owoahene Acheampong-Boateng; Kgabo T Mahlako
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Environmental complexity positively impacts affective states of broiler chickens.

Authors:  M G Anderson; A M Campbell; A Crump; G Arnott; L Jacobs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  Access to barrier perches improves behavior repertoire in broilers.

Authors:  Beth A Ventura; Frank Siewerdt; Inma Estevez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  General behaviors and perching behaviors of laying hens in cages with different colored perches.

Authors:  D H Chen; J Bao
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  On-farm broiler chicken welfare assessment using transect sampling reflects environmental inputs and production outcomes.

Authors:  Neila BenSassi; Judit Vas; Guro Vasdal; Xavier Averós; Inma Estévez; Ruth C Newberry
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Floor Substrate Preferences of Chickens: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Valerie Monckton; Jennifer L Ellis; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-12-09

7.  Effects of alpha-lipoic acid on the behavior, serum indicators, and bone quality of broilers under stocking density stress.

Authors:  Huihui Ma; Bin Xu; Wenjia Li; Fengxian Wei; Woo Kyun Kim; Chongxiao Chen; Quanyou Sun; Chen Fu; Gaili Wang; Shaoyu Li
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Effects of pen enrichment on leg health of fast and slower-growing broiler chickens.

Authors:  Bahadır Can Güz; Ingrid C de Jong; Carol Souza Da Silva; Fleur Veldkamp; Bas Kemp; Roos Molenaar; Henry van den Brand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.