Literature DB >> 33363233

Floor Substrate Preferences of Chickens: A Meta-Analysis.

Valerie Monckton1, Jennifer L Ellis1, Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek1.   

Abstract

Environmental enrichment promotes sensory and motor stimulation for species-typical behaviors, which in turn enhance animal well-being. For farmed Galliformes, housing systems often limit enrichment to bedding and litter, that simultaneously act as material for dustbathing and foraging. Therefore, this meta-analysis sought to systematically review and synthesize the substrate preference test literature for Galliformes. Data based on the following four welfare-related behaviors were extracted for analysis: (1) dustbathing, (2) foraging, (3) pecking, and (4) time spent on a given substrate. Literature searches in CAB Direct, Web of Science, and Google Scholar yielded 239 articles, and hand searching yielded an additional five articles. Ten publications that used different chicken strains as test subjects, met the criteria to be included in the systematic review. The effects of bedding type, the number of days birds had access to tested substrates, enclosure area, and substrate area, on the examined behaviors were determined. We found that birds preferred dustbathing in sand and peat moss more than on any other substrates. The bedding type, size of the enclosure, and size of the substrate area affected the amount of time that birds spent on the tested substrates. When provided the choice between bedding materials, birds spent more time on sand or peat moss than on any other substrate or on no substrate. Notably, most studies did not report relevant physical or chemical characteristics of substrate that may influence birds' preferences, such as grain size, moisture content and the level of soiling. Focusing future studies on identifying substrate characteristics that influence preferences can lead to the discovery of new, practical, enriching beddings that can be easily implemented in housing systems for Galliformes.
Copyright © 2020 Monckton, Ellis and Harlander-Matauschek.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Galliformes; Gallus gallus domesticus; bedding; dustbathing; foraging; litter; pecking

Year:  2020        PMID: 33363233      PMCID: PMC7755596          DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.584162

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Vet Sci        ISSN: 2297-1769


  35 in total

Review 1.  Invited review: Integrating quantitative findings from multiple studies using mixed model methodology.

Authors:  N R St-Pierre
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Free and operant feeding in domestic fowls.

Authors:  I J Duncan; B O Hughes
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  How does the presence of excreta affect the behavior of laying hens on scratch pads?

Authors:  B B Pokharel; I Boecker; I Y Kwon; L Jeyachanthiran; P McBride; A Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by wood dusts.

Authors:  T Estlander; R Jolanki; K Alanko; L Kanerva
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Housing and dustbathing effects on northern fowl mites (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) and chicken body lice (Menacanthus stramineus) on hens.

Authors:  C D Martin; B A Mullens
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.739

6.  Litter ammonia generation: moisture content and organic versus inorganic bedding materials.

Authors:  D M Miles; D E Rowe; T C Cathcart
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The behavioural priorities of laying hens: the effects of two methods of environment enrichment on time budgets.

Authors:  N E Bubier
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 1.777

8.  Framework for advancing rigorous research.

Authors:  Devon C Crawford; Shai D Silberberg; Walter J Koroshetz; Shannon Behrman; Cynthia J Brame; Janet L Branchaw; Emery N Brown; Erin A Clark; David Dockterman; Jordan J Elm; Pamela L Gay; Katelyn M Green; Sherry Hsi; Michael G Kaplitt; Benedict J Kolber; Alex L Kolodkin; Diane Lipscombe; Malcolm R MacLeod; Caleb C McKinney; Marcus R Munafò; Barbara Oakley; Jeffrey T Olimpo; Nathalie Percie du Sert; Indira M Raman; Ceri Riley; Amy L Shelton; Stephen Miles Uzzo
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  A Description of Laying Hen Husbandry and Management Practices in Canada.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Caitlin Decina; Christine F Baes; Tina M Widowski; Olaf Berke; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.