Literature DB >> 11178755

The role of multimedia interactive programs in training for laparoscopic procedures.

B J Ramshaw1, D Young, I Garcha, F Shuler, R Wilson, J G White, T Duncan, E Mason.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The application of minimally invasive techniques to the performance of abdominal surgery by general surgeons has been perhaps the greatest advance in the history of general surgery. The safe adoption of many of these procedures, however, has been hampered by significant obstacles, mainly due to the problem of providing adequate training for surgeons. Outside of animal and cadaver labs, most training has been didactic in nature, and adoption rates after completion of these courses are discouraging. Multimedia interactive training has been used in a number of high-tech industries with great success. A >60% improvement in the learning curve after multimedia interactive training, as compared to traditional didactic training, has been reported. Multimedia interactive training programs for surgeons that use content and input from multiple experts in laparoscopic procedures have now been developed.
METHODS: Residents from a general surgery residency program who used these programs were asked to rate their effectiveness in increasing their knowledge and comfort level prior to their participation in a real procedure as the primary surgeon or first assistant. A comparison to other traditional training techniques was also made. Eleven residents completed 41 programs designed to teach one of five different laparoscopic procedures-cholecystectomy, fundoplication, appendectomy, colon resection, or hernia repair.
RESULTS: On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest, the residents reported that the multimedia interactive training programs raised their knowledge level of the procedure from 6.0 to 8.7 (+2.7 point value increase after using the multimedia interactive program). The programs increased their comfort level when actually called on to perform or assist with the procedure from 5.3 to 8.1 (+2.8 point value increase after using the multimedia interactive program). In comparing the value of training methods for learning laparoscopic procedures, the residents rated text, lectures, videos, and animal labs at 4.7, 5.1, 6.0 and 7.3, respectively. By comparison, the residents rated the multimedia interactive training program at 8.8.
CONCLUSION: The use of multimedia interactive training programs in addition to current laparoscopic training courses may help to increase the safe adoption of laparoscopic procedures. These programs may be a beneficial adjunct to residency training programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11178755     DOI: 10.1007/s004640000319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Surgical simulation using virtual reality technology: design, implementation, and implications.

Authors:  J R Merril; G M Preminger; R Babayan; R T Roy; G L Merril
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  1994

2.  Telementoring. A practical option in surgical training.

Authors:  J C Rosser; M Wood; J H Payne; T M Fullum; G B Lisehora; L E Rosser; P J Barcia; R S Savalgi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  An approach to the evaluation of operative skills.

Authors:  J A Kopta
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Teaching and testing technical skills.

Authors:  R K Reznick
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Training for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  K A Zucker; R W Bailey; S M Graham; W Scovil; A L Imbembo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1993 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Climbing 'the learning curve'. New technologies, emerging obligations.

Authors:  M J Hatlie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  CD-ROM multimedia. The step before virtual reality.

Authors:  J Rosser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Impact of formal continuing medical education: do conferences, workshops, rounds, and other traditional continuing education activities change physician behavior or health care outcomes?

Authors:  D Davis; M A O'Brien; N Freemantle; F M Wolf; P Mazmanian; A Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The learning curve in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair for the community general surgeon.

Authors:  A J Voitk
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Continuing hazards of the learning curve in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  L Morgenstern; M F McGrath; B J Carroll; M Paz-Partlow; G Berci
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 0.688

View more
  7 in total

1.  Analysis of laboratory-based laparoscopic colorectal surgery workshops within the English National Training Programme.

Authors:  Susannah M Wyles; Danilo Miskovic; Zhifang Ni; Austin G Acheson; Charles Maxwell-Armstrong; Robert Longman; Tom Cecil; Mark G Coleman; Alan F Horgan; George B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Need for simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery training.

Authors:  Valerio Celentano
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-27

3.  Minimal-access surgery training in the Netherlands: a survey among residents-in-training for general surgery.

Authors:  M P Schijven; J T M Berlage; J J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  What to consider when designing a laparoscopic colorectal training curriculum: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Gaitanidis; C Simopoulos; M Pitiakoudis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Role of Digital Resources in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Training.

Authors:  Heidi Paine; Manish Chand
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-29

6.  An inexpensive ex-vivo porcine laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication training model.

Authors:  Aaron R Jensen; Richard Milner; John Gaughan; Harsh Grewal
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Mental practice in postgraduate training: a randomized controlled trial in mastoidectomy skills.

Authors:  Anne Conlin; Jane Lea; Manohar Bance; Neil Chadha; Shaun Kilty; Frederick Kozak; Julian Savage; Ravindar Sidhu; Joseph Chen; Brian D Westerberg
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-09-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.