Literature DB >> 11176815

Protecting the privacy of family members in survey and pedigree research.

J Botkin1.   

Abstract

The recent controversy at Virginia Commonwealth University involving research ethics raises important and complex issues in survey and pedigree research. The primary questions are whether family members of survey respondents themselves become subjects of the project and if they are subjects whether informed consent must be obtained for investigators to retain private information on these individuals. This article provides an analysis of the ethical issues and regulatory standards involved in this debate for consideration by investigators and institutional review boards. The analysis suggests that strong protections for the rights and welfare of subjects and their family members can be incorporated into survey and pedigree research protocols without hindering projects with extensive consent requirements.

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction; Legal Approach

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11176815     DOI: 10.1001/jama.285.2.207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  23 in total

1.  Confidentiality and the ethics of medical ethics.

Authors:  W A Rogers; H Draper
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The impact of privacy protections on recruitment in a multicenter stroke genetics study.

Authors:  D T Chen; B B Worrall; R D Brown; T G Brott; B M Kissela; T S Olson; S S Rich; J F Meschia
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  A survey of the SWISS researchers on the impact of sibling privacy protections on pedigree recruitment.

Authors:  Bradford B Worrall; Donna T Chen; Robert D Brown; Thomas G Brott; James F Meschia
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Protecting third parties in human subjects research.

Authors:  David B Resnik; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

Review 5.  The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices.

Authors:  M W Foster; C D M Royal; R R Sharp
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Timothy Caulfield; Mildred K Cho
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Tailoring the process of informed consent in genetic and genomic research.

Authors:  Charles N Rotimi; Patricia A Marshall
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 8.  Identifiability in biobanks: models, measures, and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Bradley Malin; Grigorios Loukides; Kathleen Benitez; Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Human Participants in Engineering Research: Notes from a Fledgling Ethics Committee.

Authors:  David Koepsell; Willem-Paul Brinkman; Sylvia Pont
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 3.525

10.  Impact of social stigma on the process of obtaining informed consent for genetic research on podoconiosis: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Fasil Tekola; Susan Bull; Bobbie Farsides; Melanie J Newport; Adebowale Adeyemo; Charles N Rotimi; Gail Davey
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.