Literature DB >> 11176550

Inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: a comparison of lengths of stay and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs health care system.

M G Stineman1, R N Ross, B B Hamilton, G Maislin, B Bates, C V Granger, D A Asch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients have longer lengths of hospital stay (LOS) in VA medical centers than in the general health care system.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether resource use and outcome differences between VA and non-VA inpatient rehabilitation facilities remain after controlling for patient and medical care delivery differences.
DESIGN: This analysis involved 60 VA inpatient rehabilitation units and 467 non-VA rehabilitation hospitals and units. Multivariate adjusted resource use and patient outcome differences were compared across setting within patients grouped by severity of disability at admission through assignment to the Function Related Group (FRG) patient classification system.
SUBJECTS: The study included 55,438 stroke patients. MEASURES: Study measures were LOS, functional status at discharge, and community discharge.
RESULTS: The VA serves a higher proportion of patients who are single, separated, or divorced; are unemployed or retired as a result of disability, and are not white (P < 0.0001). These traits tended to be associated with longer LOS, lower functional outcomes, and reduced rates of community discharge. After adjusting for these and other differences, depending on FRG, average LOS remained from 30% to 200% longer in the VA centers (P < 0.05); average functional outcomes were significantly higher in 8 and lower in 2 FRGs (P < 0.05); and community discharge rates were lower in 12 FRGs (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: While certain variables accounted for some of the observed differences in resource use and outcomes, differences remained after adjustment. Fewer incentives for cost containment and less support in patients' home environments may be among the most important unmeasured determinants of VA differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11176550     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200102000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  9 in total

1.  Medications, comorbidities, and medical complications in stroke survivors: the CAReS study.

Authors:  Sharon K Ostwald; Joan Wasserman; Sally Davis
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.625

2.  Fee-based care is important for access to prompt treatment of hip fractures among veterans.

Authors:  Kelly K Richardson; Peter Cram; Mary Vaughan-Sarrazin; Peter J Kaboli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The stroke caregiver unmet resource needs scale: development and psychometric testing.

Authors:  Rosemarie B King; Robert J Hartke; Jungwha Lee; Jason Raad
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.230

4.  The free post-stroke clinic: a successful teaching and learning model.

Authors:  Barbara M Doucet; Jill Seale
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2012

5.  Predictors of resuming therapy within four weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sharon K Ostwald; Kyler M Godwin; Hee Cheong; Stanley G Cron
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.119

6.  Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals.

Authors:  Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Bonnie Wakefield; Gary E Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  High-versus low-frequency stimulation effects on fine motor control in chronic hemiplegia: a pilot study.

Authors:  Barbara M Doucet; Lisa Griffin
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

8.  Cost-efficiency of specialist inpatient rehabilitation for working-aged adults with complex neurological disabilities: a multicentre cohort analysis of a national clinical data set.

Authors:  Lynne Turner-Stokes; Heather Williams; Alan Bill; Paul Bassett; Keith Sephton
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The Effect of Home Care for Stroke Patients and Education of Caregivers on the Caregiver Burden and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Hacer Gok Ugur; Behice Erci
Journal:  Acta Clin Croat       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 0.780

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.