PURPOSE: Immediate surgical intervention is the basis for treatment of penile fractures due to the high risk of complications associated with conservative management. Unfortunately, patient refusal to undergo surgery has led to conservative treatment of a small group of patients with presumed penile fractures at our institution. We followed these patients in regard to clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 1999, 5 patients were evaluated after blunt trauma to an erect penis. Patient age at presentation ranged from 19 to 31 years (mean 25). The interval from time of injury to presentation was 24 to 72 hours. Of these patients 4 had been injured during sexual intercourse, while 1 had been injured during masturbation. All 5 patients refused immediate surgical exploration for presumed penile fracture. RESULTS: No patient had any immediate complications. At 6 and 12-month followup all patients reported erections adequate for intercourse without associated pain. One patient reported only mild curvature for which he did not seek treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We report on a subset of young males with presumed penile fracture who refused diagnostic evaluation and therapy, and were able to maintain normal erectile and voiding function. However, longer followup and radiographic evidence will be necessary to corroborate or refute these initial observations.
PURPOSE: Immediate surgical intervention is the basis for treatment of penile fractures due to the high risk of complications associated with conservative management. Unfortunately, patient refusal to undergo surgery has led to conservative treatment of a small group of patients with presumed penile fractures at our institution. We followed these patients in regard to clinical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1992 and 1999, 5 patients were evaluated after blunt trauma to an erect penis. Patient age at presentation ranged from 19 to 31 years (mean 25). The interval from time of injury to presentation was 24 to 72 hours. Of these patients 4 had been injured during sexual intercourse, while 1 had been injured during masturbation. All 5 patients refused immediate surgical exploration for presumed penile fracture. RESULTS: No patient had any immediate complications. At 6 and 12-month followup all patients reported erections adequate for intercourse without associated pain. One patient reported only mild curvature for which he did not seek treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We report on a subset of young males with presumed penile fracture who refused diagnostic evaluation and therapy, and were able to maintain normal erectile and voiding function. However, longer followup and radiographic evidence will be necessary to corroborate or refute these initial observations.