Literature DB >> 33146978

Findings regarding non-sexual penile fracture in a referral emergency hospital.

Rodrigo Barros1,2, Alex Schul1, Andre G Cavalcanti3, Luciano Alves Favorito4, Leandro Koifman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe penile fracture (PF) findings with non-sexual etiology in a referral emergency hospital, with emphasis on demographic data, clinical and intraoperative findings and long-term outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with PF of non-sexual cause operated at our institution from January 2014 to January 2019 were submitted to surgical treatment and monitored for at least three months after surgery. Etiology of trauma, epidemiological and clinical presentation data, time to intervention and operative findings were reviewed retrospectively. The evaluation of postoperative erectile function was carried out by filling out the International Index of Erection Function - 5 (IIEF-5). The tool used to assess urinary function was the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire.
RESULTS: Of a total of 149 patients submitted to surgical treatment for PF, 18 (12%) reported non-sexual etiology. Twelve (66.6%) cases were due to penile manipulation through the act of bending the penis during morning erection, three (16.6%) when rolling over in bed with erect penis, one (5.5%) when embracing the wife during erection, one (5.5%) to laying on the partner with erect penis and the other (5.5%) when sitting on the toilet with an erection. Operative findings were unilateral corpus cavernosum injury in all cases. Only one (5.5%) patient had a partial urethral lesion. Follow-up time varied from 3 to 18 months (mean, 10.1 months). Three (16.6%) patients developed erectile dysfunction six months after surgery. However, all of them responded to treatment with IPDE-5 and reported improvement of erection, with no need for medication, on reevaluation after 18 months. One (5.5%) patient developed penile curvature < 30 degrees. Thirteen (72.2%) patients developed penile nodules. No patient presented voiding complaints during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: PF is a rare urologic emergency, especially with the non-sexual etiology. However, PF should always be considered when the clinical presentation is suggestive, regardless of the etiology. Penile manipulation and roll over in bed were the most common non-sexual causes. These cases are related to low-energy traumas, usually leading to unilateral rupture of corpus cavernosum. Urethral involvement is uncommon but may be present. Early treatment has good long-term clinical outcome, especially when performed in specialized centers with extensive experience in FP. Copyright® by the International Brazilian Journal of Urology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency Service, Hospital; Fractures ; Penis

Year:  2021        PMID: 33146978      PMCID: PMC7857745          DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2020.0420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Braz J Urol        ISSN: 1677-5538            Impact factor:   1.541


  26 in total

Review 1.  Penile fracture.

Authors:  Kevin McEleny; Peter Ramsden; Robert Pickard
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2006-03

2.  Relationship between sexual position and severity of penile fracture.

Authors:  R Barros; L Schulze; A A Ornellas; L Koifman; L A Favorito
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Penile fracture in Kermanshah, Iran: the long-term results of surgical treatment.

Authors:  Javaad Zargooshi
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Penile fracture - experience in 56 cases.

Authors:  Leandro Koifman; André G Cavalcanti; Carlos Henrique Manes; Daibes R Filho; Luciano A Favorito
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Penile Fracture: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tarik Amer; Rebekah Wilson; Piotr Chlosta; Salah AlBuheissi; Hasan Qazi; Michael Fraser; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Long-term outcome of surgical treatment of penile fracture complicated by urethral rupture.

Authors:  Ahmed El-Assmy; Hossam S El-Tholoth; Tarek Mohsen; El Housseiny I Ibrahiem
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Seventeen years' experience of penile fracture: conservative vs. surgical treatment.

Authors:  Turgut Yapanoglu; Yilmaz Aksoy; Senol Adanur; Bariş Kabadayi; Gurkan Ozturk; Isa Ozbey
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Fracture of the penis: nine cases with evaluation of reported cases in Japan.

Authors:  Tomomoto Ishikawa; Masato Fujisawa; Hiroshi Tamada; Takaaki Inoue; Nobori Shimatani
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  Fracture of penis: controversy of surgical versus conservative treatment.

Authors:  S S Kalash; J D Young
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Evaluation of epidemiology, concomitant urethral disruption and seasonal variation of penile fracture: A report of 86 cases.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Moslemi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

View more
  3 in total

1.  International Brazilian Journal of Urology Is the Official Information Journal of the American Confederation of Urology - CAU.

Authors:  Luciano A Favorito
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

2.  Editorial comment: Findings regarding non-sexual penile fracture in a referral emergency hospital.

Authors:  Eduardo B Bertero
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Editorial comment: Findings regarding non-sexual penile fracture in a referral emergency hospital.

Authors:  Valter Javaroni
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.