Literature DB >> 11175912

A simple method of computing hip axis length using fan-beam densitometry and anthropometric measurements.

J T Young1, K Carter, M S Marion, G A Greendale.   

Abstract

Hip axis length (HAL), a simple measure obtained from dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans of the proximal femur, predicts hip fracture, independent of bone mineral density and age. Owing to a magnification error associated with newer fan-beam DXA, automatic calculation of HAL, which is available in pencil-beam DXA, is inaccurate. The purpose of this study was to model HAL, measured from a pencil-beam DXA, as a function of HAL from a fan-beam DXA combined with other anthropometric measures. Proximal femur scans were performed using pencil- and fan-beam DXA in 21 women (ages 24-60). Height, weight, hip circumference, subject thickness, height of the greater trochanter and anterior superior iliac spine from the scanning table, and HAL as measured by a ruler from the scan printouts were recorded. Anthropometric measurements were taken by two researchers; all but the greater trochanter were reproducible (r > or = 0.92). A simple linear model using the manual measurement of HAL from the fan-beam scan, height, weight, body mass index, and hip circumference was able to predict HAL measured using the pencil-beam DXA with a high degree of accuracy (R(2) > or = 0.96). The fan-beam-acquired values of HAL using our model are nonbiased and accurate estimates of the "gold standard" pencil-beam method. This model may provide researchers and clinicians with a simple method of calculating HAL using fan-beam DXA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11175912     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:3:4:325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  6 in total

1.  Hip axis length in mid-life Japanese and Caucasian U.S. residents: no evidence for an ethnic difference.

Authors:  Gail A Greendale; Jean T Young; Mei-Hua Huang; Alexander Bucur; Yan Wang; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  An in vivo comparison of hip structure analysis (HSA) with measurements obtained by QCT.

Authors:  K Ramamurthi; O Ahmad; K Engelke; R H Taylor; K Zhu; S Gustafsson; R L Prince; K E Wilson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Correcting fan-beam magnification in clinical densitometry scans of growing subjects.

Authors:  Jacqueline H Cole; Jodi N Dowthwaite; Tamara A Scerpella; Marjolein C H van der Meulen
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.617

4.  A comparison of bone density and bone morphology between patients presenting with hip fractures, spinal fractures or a combination of the two.

Authors:  Richard G Crilly; Lizebeth Cox
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Does Bone Mineral Density Differ between Fan-Beam and Pencil-Beam?: A Meta-Analysis and Systemic Review.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Yoon; Young Do Koh; Jun-Il Yoo; Sujin Kim; Guen Young Lee; Sung Bin Park; Yong-Chan Ha
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2021-02-28

6.  Hip axis length variation: its correlation with anthropometric measurements in women from three ethnic groups.

Authors:  P Clark; L J Tesoriero; D J Morton; J O Talavera; A Karlamangla; D L Schneider; W J Wooten; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 4.507

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.