Literature DB >> 11173118

Duplicate and diverge: the evolution of plant genome microstructure.

I Bancroft1.   

Abstract

The use of positional approaches for the isolation of genes from most crop species is difficult due to the large size of their genomes. If the order of genes in segments of the genomes is similar in different plants, it might be feasible to use smaller genomes as templates upon which to base strategies for the positional cloning of genes from other species. Comparative genetic mapping, using markers such as restriction-fragment length polymorphisms, has revealed extensive conservation of long-range genome organization (macrostructure) between related species. But is the organization of the tens or hundreds of genes between the genetic markers also conserved? Recent results suggest that the fine-scale structure (microstructure) of plant genomes is more dynamic than previously assumed from investigations of the macrostructure.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11173118     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02179-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  24 in total

1.  The probability of preservation of a newly arisen gene duplicate.

Authors:  M Lynch; M O'Hely; B Walsh; A Force
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Through a genome, darkly: comparative analysis of plant chromosomal DNA.

Authors:  Graham J King
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 3.  Plant genome evolution: lessons from comparative genomics at the DNA level.

Authors:  Renate Schmidt
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Comparative genomics of Brassica oleracea and Arabidopsis thaliana reveal gene loss, fragmentation, and dispersal after polyploidy.

Authors:  Christopher D Town; Foo Cheung; Rama Maiti; Jonathan Crabtree; Brian J Haas; Jennifer R Wortman; Erin E Hine; Ryan Althoff; Tamara S Arbogast; Luke J Tallon; Marielle Vigouroux; Martin Trick; Ian Bancroft
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2006-04-21       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 5.  Major transitions in evolution by genome fusions: from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, metazoans, bilaterians and vertebrates.

Authors:  Jürg Spring
Journal:  J Struct Funct Genomics       Date:  2003

6.  Excess non-synonymous substitutions suggest that positive selection episodes occurred during the evolution of DNA-binding domains in the Arabidopsis R2R3-MYB gene family.

Authors:  Li Jia; Michael T Clegg; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Dynamics of the evolution of orthologous and paralogous portions of a complex locus region in two genomes of allopolyploid wheat.

Authors:  Xiu-Ying Kong; Yong Qiang Gu; Frank M You; Jorge Dubcovsky; Olin D Anderson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.076

8.  Analyses of LTR-retrotransposon structures reveal recent and rapid genomic DNA loss in rice.

Authors:  Jianxin Ma; Katrien M Devos; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-04-12       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Differential lineage-specific amplification of transposable elements is responsible for genome size variation in Gossypium.

Authors:  Jennifer S Hawkins; HyeRan Kim; John D Nason; Rod A Wing; Jonathan F Wendel
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Syntenic relationships between Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis reveal extensive divergence of genome organization.

Authors:  Hongyan Zhu; Dong-Jin Kim; Jong-Min Baek; Hong-Kyu Choi; Leland C Ellis; Helge Küester; W Richard McCombie; Hui-Mei Peng; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 8.340

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.