E S Surrey1, A K Lietz, W B Schoolcraft. 1. Colorado Center for Reproductive Medicine, 799 E. Hampden Avenue, Suite #300, Englewood, Colorado 80110, USA. cerm@colorm.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of intramural uterine leiomyomata and a normal endometrial cavity on IVF-ET cycle outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective case-controlled analysis. SETTING: Tertiary-care-assisted reproductive technology program. PATIENT(S): Three hundred ninety-nine consecutive fresh IVF-ET cycles were performed in patients with a normal precycle diagnostic hysteroscopy; patients were divided into four groups. Group 1: positive leiomyomata, age <40 years (n = 51 cycles); group 2: negative leiomyomata, age <40 years (n = 57 cycles); group 3: positive leiomyomata, age > or =40 years (n = 22 cycles); group 4: negative leiomyomata, age > or =40 years (n = 59 cycles). A subgroup of all group 2 patients aged 35-39 (group 2A, n = 113 cycles) was also evaluated as an additional control. INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, IVF-ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation (IR), live birth (LBR) rates. RESULT(S): There were no significant differences in LBR among age-matched controls: group 1 (49%) versus 2 (57.5%) or 2A (57%) and group 3 (40.9%) versus 4 (32.2%). IR was significantly lower in group 1 (21.4%) versus 2 (33.3%) or 2A (33.9%) but not in group 3 (17.5%) versus 4 (11.6%). Implantation did not correlate with either mean leiomyoma diameter or volume. CONCLUSION(S): [1] LBR was not affected by the presence of intramural leiomyoma in IVF-ET patients with hysteroscopically normal endometrial cavities. [2] A significant decrease in IR was only noted in patients <40 years old. [3] Given the relatively high LBR in all groups, prophylactic surgical intervention cannot be justified, but precycle hysteroscopy evaluation is recommended.
OBJECTIVE: Assess the impact of intramural uterine leiomyomata and a normal endometrial cavity on IVF-ET cycle outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective case-controlled analysis. SETTING: Tertiary-care-assisted reproductive technology program. PATIENT(S): Three hundred ninety-nine consecutive fresh IVF-ET cycles were performed in patients with a normal precycle diagnostic hysteroscopy; patients were divided into four groups. Group 1: positive leiomyomata, age <40 years (n = 51 cycles); group 2: negative leiomyomata, age <40 years (n = 57 cycles); group 3: positive leiomyomata, age > or =40 years (n = 22 cycles); group 4: negative leiomyomata, age > or =40 years (n = 59 cycles). A subgroup of all group 2 patients aged 35-39 (group 2A, n = 113 cycles) was also evaluated as an additional control. INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, IVF-ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation (IR), live birth (LBR) rates. RESULT(S): There were no significant differences in LBR among age-matched controls: group 1 (49%) versus 2 (57.5%) or 2A (57%) and group 3 (40.9%) versus 4 (32.2%). IR was significantly lower in group 1 (21.4%) versus 2 (33.3%) or 2A (33.9%) but not in group 3 (17.5%) versus 4 (11.6%). Implantation did not correlate with either mean leiomyoma diameter or volume. CONCLUSION(S): [1] LBR was not affected by the presence of intramural leiomyoma in IVF-ET patients with hysteroscopically normal endometrial cavities. [2] A significant decrease in IR was only noted in patients <40 years old. [3] Given the relatively high LBR in all groups, prophylactic surgical intervention cannot be justified, but precycle hysteroscopy evaluation is recommended.
Authors: Aaron K Styer; Susan Jin; Dan Liu; Baisong Wang; Alex J Polotsky; Mindy S Christianson; Wendy Vitek; Lawrence Engmann; Karl Hansen; Robert Wild; Richard S Legro; Christos Coutifaris; Ruben Alvero; Randal D Robinson; Peter Casson; Gregory M Christman; Alicia Christy; Michael P Diamond; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang; Nanette Santoro Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2017-01-12 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: James H Segars; Estella C Parrott; Joan D Nagel; Xiaoxiao Catherine Guo; Xiaohua Gao; Linda S Birnbaum; Vivian W Pinn; Darlene Dixon Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Hao Huang; Hongying Kuang; Fangbai Sun; Michael P Diamond; Richard S Legro; Christos Coutifaris; Ruben Alvero; Randal D Robinson; Peter R Casson; Gregory M Christman; Karl R Hansen; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Memy H Hassan; Salama A Salama; Dong Zhang; Hossam M M Arafa; Farid M A Hamada; Hala Fouad; Cheryl C Walker; Ayman Al-Hendy Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 7.329