Literature DB >> 11170136

Health-related quality of life in patients with screen-detected versus clinically diagnosed prostate cancer preceding primary treatment.

J B Madalinska1, M L Essink-Bot, H J de Koning, W J Kirkels, P J van der Maas, F H Schröder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate baseline health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with localized prostate cancer before primary treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy).
METHODS: Two hundred patients with newly diagnosed localized (screen-detected or clinically diagnosed) prostate cancer completed HRQOL questionnaires (generic and disease-specific measures). Clinical data were collected from patients' medical records in four Rotterdam hospitals.
RESULTS: Screen-detected tumors were of more favorable stages and grades than clinically diagnosed ones. The diagnostic groups did not differ significantly in bowel and sexual functioning. Differences were found in urinary functioning, favoring patients with screen-detected tumors of T2-T3 stages. Patients with screen-detected T2 cancer reported better generic HRQOL (physical aspects) than the clinical group, but HRQOL of the latter group was similar to the population norm. Radiotherapy patients were significantly older and had more comorbidity than subjects referred to prostatectomy. Urinary, bowel, and sexual problems were uncommon. Older (> 65 years) radiotherapy patients appeared to be less sexually active. Radiotherapy patients also reported poorer levels of generic HRQOL.
CONCLUSIONS: Screen-detected prostate cancer patients presented with more favorable cancer stage and grade. HRQOL was related to both the tumor stage and the detection method. Pre-treatment HRQOL differences between prostatectomy and radiotherapy patients were associated neither with tumor characteristics nor with the detection method. Baseline differences in HRQOL should be taken into account when evaluating post-treatment HRQOL. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11170136     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0045(20010201)46:2<87::aid-pros1012>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  6 in total

1.  Long-term disease-specific functioning among prostate cancer survivors and noncancer controls in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; George Luta; Anthony B Miller; Timothy R Church; Scott P Kelly; Larry R Muenz; Kimberly M Davis; David L Dawson; Sara Edmond; Douglas Reding; Jerome E Mabie; Thomas L Riley
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Impact of diagnosis and treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer on health-related quality of life for older Americans: a population-based study.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Angela M Stover; Roxanne E Jensen; Ronald C Chen; Kathryn L Taylor; Steven B Clauser; Sean P Collins; Arnold L Potosky
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Measuring disease specific quality of life in localized prostate cancer: the Dutch experience.

Authors:  I J Korfage; M L Essink-Bot; J B Madalinska; W J Kirkels; M S Litwin; H J de Koning
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Evaluating the impact on quality of life of chemoradiation in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Z Kassam; H Mackay; C A Buckley; S Fung; M Pintile; J Kim; J Ringash
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 5.  Genetic risk assessments in individuals at high risk for inherited breast cancer in the breast oncology care setting.

Authors:  Tuya Pal; Susan T Vadaparampil
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 6.  Quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  David F Penson; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.862

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.