Literature DB >> 11169147

Expression of p21Waf1, p27Kip1 and cyclin D1 proteins in breast ductal carcinoma in situ: Relation with clinicopathologic characteristics and with p53 expression and estrogen receptor status.

Y L Oh1, J S Choi, S Y Song, Y H Ko, B K Han, S J Nam, J H Yang.   

Abstract

p21Waf1 (p21), p27Kip1 (p27) and cyclin D1 have recently been reported as useful prognostic markers for patients with breast carcinoma. However, studies on these cell cycle regulators in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been extremely limited. Therefore, we studied the immunohistochemical expression of p21, p27 and cyclin D1 proteins in 49 DCIS cases and compared the findings with the clinicopathologic parameters (age, tumor size, gross type, histologic type, histologic grade, necrosis and mitotic index), p53 and estrogen receptor (ER) status. A significant correlation was found between positive p21 immunoreactivity (67.3% of the cases) and well-differentiated histologic grade, non-comedo type, ER-positive and p53-negative (p53-) status. DCIS with p21+/p53- is likely to be the non-comedo type. The overexpression of cyclin D1 (59.2% of the cases) correlated positively with the ER expression (P = 0.001). The p27 protein expression (46.9% of the cases) correlated with the cyclin D1 immunopositivity (P = 0.0003) and ER expression (P = 0.005). No significant associations were seen in the p27 or cyclin D1 expression and other clinicopathologic parameters. Our results suggest that p21 might be more related to the useful biologic markers in DCIS than p27 or cyclin D1. The significant positive association between p21, p27 or cyclin D1 and ER status, and close association of p27 and cyclin D1 expression might be implicated in the tumor biology of DCIS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11169147     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2001.01173.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Int        ISSN: 1320-5463            Impact factor:   2.534


  16 in total

Review 1.  Cell cycle genes in a mouse mammary hyperplasia model.

Authors:  Thenaa K Said; Daniel Medina
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 2.  Assessing estrogen signaling aberrations in breast cancer risk using genetically engineered mouse models.

Authors:  Priscilla A Furth; M Carla Cabrera; Edgar S Díaz-Cruz; Sarah Millman; Rebecca E Nakles
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Deregulated estrogen receptor alpha and p53 heterozygosity collaborate in the development of mammary hyperplasia.

Authors:  Edgar S Díaz-Cruz; Priscilla A Furth
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  p21WAF1/CIP1 selectively controls the transcriptional activity of estrogen receptor alpha.

Authors:  Asmaà Fritah; Cécile Saucier; Jan Mester; Gérard Redeuilh; Michèle Sabbah
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 5.  Next-generation sequencing: a powerful tool for the discovery of molecular markers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Hitchintan Kaur; Shihong Mao; Seema Shah; David H Gorski; Stephen A Krawetz; Bonnie F Sloane; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Loss of cyclin D1 in concert with deregulated estrogen receptor alpha expression induces DNA damage response activation and interrupts mammary gland morphogenesis.

Authors:  M S Frech; K M Torre; G W Robinson; P A Furth
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2007-12-10       Impact factor: 9.867

7.  Validation of transgenic models of breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and Brca1-mutation-related breast cancer.

Authors:  M S Frech; L P Jones; P A Furth
Journal:  Breast Cancer Online       Date:  2005-08-01

8.  Retinoblastoma and phosphate and tensin homolog tumor suppressors: impact on ductal carcinoma in situ progression.

Authors:  Erik S Knudsen; Thomas F Pajak; Maria Qeenan; A Kathleen McClendon; Benjamin D Armon; Gordon F Schwartz; Agnieszka K Witkiewicz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 9.  ER and PR signaling nodes during mammary gland development.

Authors:  Tamara Tanos; Lucia Rojo; Pablo Echeverria; Cathrin Brisken
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Analysis of prognostic factors and treatment modality changes in breast cancer: a single institution study in Korea.

Authors:  Won-Suk Lee; Jeong Eon Lee; Jung Han Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Jung-Hyun Yang
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.