Literature DB >> 11168541

The integration of parallel and serial processing mechanisms in visual search: evidence from eye movement recording.

C Maioli1, I Benaglio, S Siri, K Sosta, S Cappa.   

Abstract

We examined timing and scanning paths of eye movements during a visual search task, in which subjects had to detect, as quickly as possible, the presence or absence of a target among distractors [Q-like element among O stimuli (QvsO) and vice-versa (OvsQ)]. According to an influential theory [Treisman, A. & Gelade, G. (1980) Cognitive Psychol, 12, 97--136; Treisman, A. & Sato, S. (1990) J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 16, 459--478], only tasks yielding nonflat search functions (OvsQ) involve focal attention. Alternative models propose that all kinds of visual search are resolved by a biased competitive process, working in parallel across the visual field. Data show that QvsO and OvsQ tasks are characterized by quantitative rather than by qualitative differences in search strategy. No differences between the two tasks were found regarding either the percentage of saccades foveating single stimulus items or the timing of the button response with respect to the onset of the last foveation saccade within a trial. Furthermore, the number of saccades made during search predicted very accurately the time required to accomplish the task and fixation times were independent of the number of stimulus items. On the basis of our results there is no reason to postulate the occurrence of shifts of visuospatial attention, other than those associated with the executions of saccadic eye movements, which are driven by a parallel feature analysis of the visual scene, in both types of search tasks. A time-limited competitive model for attentive target identification, in which both parallel (competitive) and serial (attentive) processing mechanisms are integrated, can account for these findings, providing a unified conceptual framework for all kinds of visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11168541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  7 in total

1.  Eye movements as a gatekeeper for memorization: evidence for the persistence of attentional sets in visual memory search.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-05-28

2.  Extrafoveal preview benefit during free-viewing visual search in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Anna E Ipata; James W Bisley; Jacqueline Gottlieb; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Time course of target recognition in visual search.

Authors:  Andreas Kotowicz; Ueli Rutishauser; Christof Koch
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Common capacity-limited neural mechanisms of selective attention and spatial working memory encoding.

Authors:  Fabian Fusser; David E J Linden; Benjamin Rahm; Harald Hampel; Corinna Haenschel; Jutta S Mayer
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Spatial coding for the Simon effect in visual search.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Xiaolin Zhou; Giuseppe di Pellegrino; Elisabetta Ladavas
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 2.064

6.  Involvement of prefrontal cortex in visual search.

Authors:  E J Anderson; S K Mannan; M Husain; G Rees; P Sumner; D J Mort; D McRobbie; C Kennard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.064

7.  Beyond correlation: do color features influence attention in rainforest?

Authors:  Hans-Peter Frey; Kerstin Wirz; Verena Willenbockel; Torsten Betz; Cornell Schreiber; Tomasz Troscianko; Peter König
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.