Literature DB >> 11168262

Prosthetic management of the partially dentate patient with fixed implant restorations.

U C Belser1, R Mericske-Stern, J P Bernard, T D Taylor.   

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to discuss the current prosthetic management of the partially dentate patient by means of fixed implant restorations in the scope of the ITI(R) Dental Implant System. For that purpose, the related statements defined by the participants of the prosthodontic section of the 1997 ITI Consensus Conference in Vitznau, Switzerland, will be presented, completed by explanatory comments where appropriate. Distinct conceptual differences will be made between the esthetic zone (areas of the dental arches where esthetic considerations are of primary concern) and the non-esthetic zone (regions of the jaws where esthetic aspects do not represent a priority), and between single tooth replacement and multiple unit implant restorations. Furthermore, it is underlined that current clinical concepts should be based on both predictable treatment outcome and cost-effectiveness. In this context, a straightforward surgical and prosthetic protocol is generally preferred in posterior locations of the oral cavity, using a nonsubmerged implant placement comprising an easily accessible implant shoulder location, and subsequently cemented implant restorations, basically according to a traditional prosthodontic approach. In esthetically demanding indications, where normally a distinctly submucosal implant shoulder location is advocated, screw-retained restorations are preferred, based on prefabricated prosthetic components (e.g. machined cast-on copings) to assure optimum surface properties and contour, and to achieve adequate marginal adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11168262     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1126.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

1.  Bone strains around apically free versus grafted implants in the posterior maxilla of human cadavers.

Authors:  Murat Cavit Cehreli; Murat Akkocaoglu; Ayhan Comert; Ibrahim Tekdemir; Kivanc Akca
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation on humans: Packing simulations and 8 months histomorphometric comparative study of anorganic bone matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate particles as grafting materials.

Authors:  A Martinez; J Franco; E Saiz; F Guitian
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.328

3.  Assessment of bone channels other than the nasopalatine canal in the anterior maxilla using limited cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Thomas von Arx; Scott Lozanoff; Pedram Sendi; Michael M Bornstein
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Cortical lamina technique: A therapeutic approach for lateral ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Shree-Lakshmi Deepika-Penmetsa; Raison Thomas; Tarun-Kumar Baron; Rucha Shah; Dhoom-Singh Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01

Review 5.  Combined Implant and Tooth Support: An Up-to-Date Comprehensive Overview.

Authors:  Mahmoud K Al-Omiri; Maher Al-Masri; Mohannad M Alhijawi; Edward Lynch
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2017-03-23

Review 6.  Aesthetic Parameters and Patient-Perspective Assessment Tools for Maxillary Anterior Single Implants.

Authors:  Kelvin I Afrashtehfar; Mansour K A Assery; S Ross Bryant
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-02-17

7.  Wear resistance of indirect composite resins used for provisional restorations supported by implants.

Authors:  Akimasa Tsujimoto; Carlos Jurado; Jose Villalobos-Tinoco; Wayne Barkmeier; Nicholas Fischer; Toshiki Takamizawa; Mark Latta; Masashi Miyazaki
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 1.904

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.