Literature DB >> 11168228

Pulsed electromagnetic fields promote bone formation around dental implants inserted into the femur of rabbits.

H Matsumoto1, M Ochi, Y Abiko, Y Hirose, T Kaku, K Sakaguchi.   

Abstract

The present study examined the effect of applying a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on bone formation around a rough-surfaced dental implant. A dental implant was inserted into the femur of Japanese white rabbits bilaterally. A PEMF with a pulse width of 25 microseconds and a pulse frequency of 100 Hz was applied. PEMF stimulation was applied for 4 h or 8 h per day, at a magnetic intensity of 0.2 mT, 0.3 mT or 0.8 mT. The animals were sacrificed 1, 2 or 4 weeks after implantation. After staining the resin sections with 2% basic fuchsin and 0.1% methylene blue, newly formed bone around the implant on tissue sections was evaluated by computer image analysis. The bone contact ratios of the PEMF-treated femurs were significantly larger than those of the control groups. Both the bone contact ratio and bone area ratio of the 0.2 mT- and 0.3 mT-treated femurs were significantly larger than the respective value of the 0.8 mT-treated femurs (P < 0.001). No significant difference in bone contact ratio or bone area ratio was observed whether PEMF was applied for 4 h/day or 8 h/day. Although a significantly greater amount of bone had formed around the implant of the 2-week treated femurs than the 1-week treated femurs, no significant difference was observed between the 2-week and 4-week treated femurs. These results suggest that PEMF stimulation may be useful for promoting bone formation around rough-surfaced dental implants. It is important to select the proper magnetic intensity, duration per day, and length of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11168228     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011004354.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  12 in total

1.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields preserve bone architecture and mechanical properties and stimulate porous implant osseointegration by promoting bone anabolism in type 1 diabetic rabbits.

Authors:  J Cai; W Li; T Sun; X Li; E Luo; D Jing
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Effect of low frequency electromagnetic fields on A2A adenosine receptors in human neutrophils.

Authors:  Katia Varani; Stefania Gessi; Stefania Merighi; Valeria Iannotta; Elena Cattabriga; Susanna Spisani; Ruggero Cadossi; Pier Andrea Borea
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Histological analysis of the effects of a static magnetic field on bone healing process in rat femurs.

Authors:  Edela Puricelli; Lucienne M Ulbrich; Deise Ponzoni; João Julio da Cunha Filho
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  The effect of high voltage, high frequency pulsed electric field on slain ovine cortical bone.

Authors:  Hajarossadat Asgarifar; Adekunle Oloyede; Firuz Zare
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2014-04

6.  Pulsed electromagnetic fields promote osteogenesis and osseointegration of porous titanium implants in bone defect repair through a Wnt/β-catenin signaling-associated mechanism.

Authors:  Da Jing; Mingming Zhai; Shichao Tong; Fei Xu; Jing Cai; Guanghao Shen; Yan Wu; Xiaokang Li; Kangning Xie; Juan Liu; Qiaoling Xu; Erping Luo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of Electromagnetic Stimulation on Gene Expression of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Repair of Bone Lesions.

Authors:  Maryam Jazayeri; Mohammad Ali Shokrgozar; Nooshin Haghighipour; Bahram Bolouri; Fereshteh Mirahmadi; Mehdi Farokhi
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Magnetic Field Effects on Bone Repair after Calcium Phosphate Cement Implants: Histometric and Biochemistry Evaluation.

Authors:  Thiago Calcagnotto; Marcos Miguel Bechstedt Schwengber; Carlos Cesar De Antoni; Danilo Louzada de Oliveira; Théssio Mina Vago; Jessica Guilinelli
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

9.  Micro-morphologic changes around biophysically-stimulated titanium implants in ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Kivanc Akca; Ebru Sarac; Ugur Baysal; Mete Fanuscu; Ting-Ling Chang; Murat Cehreli
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  Comparison of Resonance Frequency Analysis and of Quantitative Ultrasound to Assess Dental Implant Osseointegration.

Authors:  Romain Vayron; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Benoît Lecuelle; Hugues Albini Lomami; Jean-Paul Meningaud; Romain Bosc; Guillaume Haiat
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.