Literature DB >> 11168224

A histological evaluation of TiO2-gritblasted and Ca-P magnetron sputter coated implants placed into the trabecular bone of the goat: Part 2.

S Vercaigne1, J G Wolke, I Naert, J A Jansen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the synergetic influence of surface topography and chemical composition of oral implant materials on bone response. For the experiment screw designed implants were used. The implants were grit-blasted with TiO2 particles. The implants were left uncoated (Ti) or provided with three different amorphous/crystalline Ca-P magnetron sputter coatings, resp. 0.1 micron (CaP-0.1), 1 micron (CaP-1) and 4 microns (CaP-4), in thickness. The implants were inserted in the medial femoral condyles of 12 goats. Each femur received 2 implants. After implantation periods of 6 and 12 weeks the implants were retrieved and prepared for histological and histomorphometrical evaluation (bone contact and bone mass). The light microscopy revealed that bone response to CaP-4 and CaP-1 implants was similar. For example, after 12 weeks, screw threads were almost completely covered with bone. In contrast to CaP-0.1 and Ti implants, where bone apposition was less pronounced. Histomorphometry demonstrated that the bone-to-implant contact for the CaP-1 and CaP-4 implants was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than for the CaP-0.1 and Ti implants. This difference existed already after 6 weeks and was even enhanced after 12 weeks. The bone mass measurements revealed that only at 12 weeks CaP-4 implants had significantly more bone contact inside the screw threads than non-coated Ti-implants (P < 0.05). Supported by our findings, we conclude that the additional application of a 1-4 microns thick Ca-P magnetron sputter coating can further improve the healing response to surface roughened oral implants placed into trabecular bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11168224     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011004314.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  7 in total

Review 1.  Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration.

Authors:  A Barfeie; J Wilson; J Rees
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Calcium orthophosphate coatings, films and layers.

Authors:  Sergey V Dorozhkin
Journal:  Prog Biomater       Date:  2012-09-26

3.  Techniques for dental implant nanosurface modifications.

Authors:  Preeti Pachauri; Lakshmana Rao Bathala; Rajashekar Sangur
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Nanotechnology in Dental Sciences: Moving towards a Finer Way of Doing Dentistry.

Authors:  Vuk Uskoković; Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  A comparative study of the bone contact to zirconium and titanium implants after 8 weeks of implantation in rabbit femoral condyles.

Authors:  Abdullah Aldosari AlFarraj; Anil Sukumaran; Mohammad D Al Amri; Aja Bart Van Oirschot; John A Jansen
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  A resonance frequency analysis of sandblasted and acid-etched implants with different diameters: a prospective clinical study during the initial healing period.

Authors:  Hyun-Joo Kim; Yeun-Kang Kim; Ji-Young Joo; Ju-Youn Lee
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  The behavior of osteoblast-like cells on various substrates with functional blocking of integrin-beta1 and integrin-beta3.

Authors:  M C Siebers; X F Walboomers; J van den Dolder; S C G Leeuwenburgh; J G C Wolke; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.896

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.