Literature DB >> 11168213

Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans.

M Yildirim1, H Spiekermann, S Biesterfeld, D Edelhoff.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate bone formation following maxillary sinus augmentation using bovine bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood by means of histologic and histomorphometric examination of human biopsies. This involved a total of 15 sinus floor elevation procedures being carried out on 11 patients (average age of 49.6 years) according to the technique described by Tatum (1986). The subantral sinus cavity was augmented using bovine apatite combined with venous blood. After an average healing phase of 6.8 months, trephine burrs were used to take 22 bone biopsies from the augmented sinus region. Then 38 Brånemark implants were inserted in both the osteotomies resulting from bone sampling and in regular sites in the augmented posterior maxilla. Histomorphometric analysis of ground sections from the bone biopsies prepared according to the standard method of Donath & Breuner (1982) produced an average percentage of newly-formed bone of 14.7% (+/- 5.0%) and a proportion of residual xenogenic bone substitute material of 29.7% (+/- 7.8%). Some 29.1% (+/- 8.1%) of the surface of the Bio-Oss granulate was in direct contact with newly-formed bone. Histologically, newly-developed bone became evident, partly invaginating the particles of apatite and forming bridges in the form of trabeculae between the individual Bio-Oss particles. Despite the absence of osteoclastic activity, the inward growth of bone indicates slow resorption of the xenogenic bone graft material. When the implants were uncovered, after an average healing phase of 6 months, 4 of the 38 implants had become loose. Of these 4 implants, 1 had to be subsequently explanted, while the others remained as "sleeping implants" and were not included in the implants superstructure. Thus, the resulting clinical survival rate, prior to prosthetic loading, was 89.5%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11168213     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011003217.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  37 in total

1.  Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Autologous and Heterologous Bone Graft: A Clinical and Radiographic Report of Immediate and Delayed Implant Placement.

Authors:  Mario Santagata; Umberto Tozzi; Gianpaolo Tartaro; Vincenzo Santillo; Corrado Giovanni; Ettore Lamart; Angelo Itro; Giuseppe Colella; Salvatore D'Amato
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-08-30

2.  The influence of bone substitute materials on the bone volume after maxillary sinus augmentation: a microcomputerized tomography study.

Authors:  Sebastian Kühl; Christoph Brochhausen; Hermann Götz; Andreas Filippi; Michael Payer; Bernd d'Hoedt; Matthias Kreisler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Comparison of Material-mediated Bone Regeneration Capacities of Sintered and Non-sintered Xenogeneic Bone Substitutes via 2D and 3D Data.

Authors:  Eleni Kapogianni; Mike Barbeck; Tim Fienitz; Daniel Rothamel; Ole Jung; Aylin Arslan; Lennart Kuhnel; Xin Xiong; Rumen Krastev; Reinhard E. Friedrich; Reinhard Schnettler
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation on humans: Packing simulations and 8 months histomorphometric comparative study of anorganic bone matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate particles as grafting materials.

Authors:  A Martinez; J Franco; E Saiz; F Guitian
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.328

5.  Comparative study of alveolar bone height and implant survival rate between autogenous bone mixed with platelet rich plasma versus venous blood for maxillary sinus lift augmentation procedure.

Authors:  Namineni Kiran Kumar; Mahaboob Shaik; Koteswara Rao Nadella; Balakrishna Manohar Chintapalli
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2014-07-15

6.  Incomplete bone formation after sinus augmentation: A case report on radiological findings by computerized tomography at follow-up.

Authors:  Kyung-Shil Lee; Young-Hyuk Kwon; Yeek Herr; Seung-Il Shin; Ji-Yeon Lee; Jong-Hyuk Chung
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Reconstructive periodontal therapy with simultaneous ridge augmentation. A clinical and histological case series report.

Authors:  Péter Windisch; Dóra Szendroi-Kiss; Attila Horváth; Zsuzsanna Suba; István Gera; Anton Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Effects of bone regeneration materials and tooth movement timing on canine experimental orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Ferdinand Mabula Machibya; Yiyuan Zhuang; Weizhong Guo; Dongdong You; Shan Lin; Dong Wu; Jiang Chen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  A new biphasic osteoinductive calcium composite material with a negative Zeta potential for bone augmentation.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Andreas Kolk; Marcus Gerressen; Oliver Driemel; Oliver Maciejewski; Benita Hermanns-Sachweh; Dieter Riediger; Jamal M Stein
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 2.151

10.  A histomorphometric meta-analysis of sinus elevation with various grafting materials.

Authors:  Jörg Handschel; Melani Simonowska; Christian Naujoks; Rita A Depprich; Michelle A Ommerborn; Ulrich Meyer; Norbert R Kübler
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.