Literature DB >> 11167792

Patients with de novo acute myeloid leukaemia and complex karyotype aberrations show a poor prognosis despite intensive treatment: a study of 90 patients.

C Schoch1, T Haferlach, D Haase, C Fonatsch, H Löffler, B Schlegelberger, P Staib, M C Sauerland, A Heinecke, T Büchner, W Hiddemann.   

Abstract

The clinical significance of complex chromosome aberrations for adults with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) was assessed in 920 patients with de novo AML who were karyotyped and treated within the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) trials. Complex chromosome aberrations were defined as three or more numerical and/or structural chromosome aberrations excluding translocations t(8;21)(q22;q22), t(15;17)(q22;q11-q12) and inv(16)(p13q22). Complex chromosome anomalies were detected in 10% of all cases with a significantly higher incidence in patients > or = 60 years of age (17.8% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.0001). Clinical follow-up data were available for 90 patients. Forty-five patients were < 60 years of age and were randomly assigned to double induction therapy with either TAD-TAD [thioguanine, daunorubicin, cytosine arabinoside (AraC)] or TAD-HAM (high-dose AraC, mitoxantrone). Twenty-one patients achieved complete remission (CR) (47%), 20 patients (44%) were non-responders and 9% of patients died during aplasia (early death). The median overall survival (OS) was 7 months and the OS rate at 3 years was 12%. Patients receiving TAD-HAM showed a significantly higher CR rate than patients receiving TAD-TAD (56% vs. 23%, P = 0.04). Median event-free survival was less than 1 month in the TAD-TAD group and 2 months in the TAD-HAM group, respectively (P = 0.04), with a median OS of 4.5 months vs. 7.6 months (P = 0.13) and an OS after 3 years of 7.6% vs. 19.6%. Forty-five patients were > or = 60 years of age: 28 of these patient were treated for induction using one or two TAD courses and 17 cases received TAD-HAM with an age-adjusted reduction of the AraC dose. The CR rate was 44%, 38% were non-responders and 18% experienced early death. The median OS was 8 months and the OS rate at 3 years was 6%. In conclusion, complex chromosome aberrations in de novo AML predicted a dismal outcome, even when patients were treated with intensive chemotherapy. Patients under the age of 60 years with complex aberrant karyotypes may benefit from HAM treatment during induction. However, long-term survival rates are low and alternative treatment strategies for remission induction and consolidation are urgently needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11167792     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.02511.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  29 in total

1.  Prognostic implications of additional chromosome abnormalities among patients with de novo acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17).

Authors:  Peter H Wiernik; Zhuoxin Sun; Holly Gundacker; Gordon Dewald; Marilyn L Slovak; Elisabeth Paietta; Haesook T Kim; Frederick R Appelbaum; Peter A Cassileth; Martin S Tallman
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Cytogenetic, molecular genetic, and clinical characteristics of acute myeloid leukemia with a complex karyotype.

Authors:  Krzysztof Mrózek
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  Fas, Fas-associated death domain-like interleukin 1beta-converting enzyme-like inhibitory protein, and apoptotic features of elderly acute myeloid leukemia based on response to induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Hee-Je Kim; Byung-Hee Park; Young Choi; Woo-Sung Min; Jong-Wook Lee; Chun-Choo Kim
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.490

4.  Acute promyelocytic leukemia with t(15;17) and two previously unreported additional cytogenetic abnormalities.

Authors:  Armin Rashidi; Stephen I Fisher
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Cytogenetics in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.075

6.  An analysis of complex chromosomal aberrations in seven cases of myelodysplastic syndromes by M-FISH and whole chromosome painting.

Authors:  Jian-Yong Li; Bing Xiao; Li-Juan Chen; Jin-Lan Pan; Wei Xu; Hai-Rong Qiu; Li Li; Yong-Quan Xue
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.490

7.  Prognostic implications of chromosome 17 abnormalities in the context of monosomal karyotype in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and complex cytogenetics.

Authors:  Aziz Nazha; Hagop M Kantarjian; Vijaya R Bhatt; Graciela Nogueras-Gonzalez; Jorge E Cortes; Tapan Kadia; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Lynne Abruzzo; Naval Daver; Naveen Pemmaraju; Alfonso Quintas-Cardama; Farhad Ravandi; Michael Keating; Gautam Borthakur
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2014-01-22

8.  Acute myeloid leukemias with reciprocal rearrangements can be distinguished by specific gene expression profiles.

Authors:  Claudia Schoch; Alexander Kohlmann; Susanne Schnittger; Benedikt Brors; Martin Dugas; Susanne Mergenthaler; Wolfgang Kern; Wolfgang Hiddemann; Roland Eils; Torsten Haferlach
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: establishment of indications on the basis of individual risk stratification.

Authors:  Axel Rolf Zander; Ulrike Bacher; Jürgen Finke
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Gemcitabine and arabinosylcytosin pharmacogenomics: genome-wide association and drug response biomarkers.

Authors:  Liang Li; Brooke L Fridley; Krishna Kalari; Gregory Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Richard M Weinshilboum; Liewei Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.