Literature DB >> 11167342

B-mode, power Doppler and contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography in the diagnosis of breast tumors.

H Reinikainen1, T Rissanen, M Päivänsalo, E Pääkkö, J Jauhiainen, I Suramo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the role of B-mode and unenhanced and enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography (US) in differentiating solid breast lesions, and to find out whether morphologically different tumors differ in terms of vascularity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-five lesions, indeterminate or suggestive of malignancy after mammography were prospectively examined with B-mode and unenhanced and enhanced power Doppler US. The lesions were classified as benign, indeterminate or malignant at B-mode, and as benign or malignant at power Doppler US. The results were compared to the histologic diagnoses. Vascularity was analyzed also quantitatively to find out whether threshold values for differential diagnostics could be set.
RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of the morphologic evaluation were 100%, 10%, and 57%, respectively. Rounded lesions were more vascular than spiculated lesions, but vascular assessment was only helpful when it supported a benign morphology. In quantitative analysis, due to the overlap between the benign and malignant lesions, no threshold values could be set.
CONCLUSION: Morphologic criteria were useful in characterizing malignant lesions, but the large proportion of indeterminate findings decreased the specificity of US. Neither unenhanced, nor enhanced power Doppler US was able to improve diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11167342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  7 in total

Review 1.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

2.  Benign versus malignant breast masses: optical differentiation with US-guided optical imaging reconstruction.

Authors:  Quing Zhu; Edward B Cronin; Allen A Currier; Hugh S Vine; Minming Huang; NanGuang Chen; Chen Xu
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterisation of breast masses: utility of quantitative analysis in comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Natalia Caproni; Francesca Marchisio; Annarita Pecchi; Barbara Canossi; Rachele Battista; Piero D'Alimonte; Pietro Torricelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Value of tissue harmonic imaging (THI) and contrast harmonic imaging (CHI) in detection and characterisation of breast tumours.

Authors:  D- A Clevert; E M Jung; K-P Jungius; K Ertan; R Kubale
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Breast contrast-enhanced ultrasound: is a scoring system feasible? A preliminary study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Xiao; Bing Ou; Haiyun Yang; Huan Wu; Baoming Luo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The contribution of three-dimensional power Doppler imaging in the preoperative assessment of breast tumors: a preliminary report.

Authors:  K Kalmantis; C Dimitrakakis; Ch Koumpis; A Tsigginou; N Papantoniou; S Mesogitis; A Antsaklis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009

7.  Diagnostic value of elastography using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and strain ratio for breast tumors.

Authors:  Yoon Seok Kim; Jung Gu Park; Beom Su Kim; Chung Han Lee; Dong Won Ryu
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.588

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.