Literature DB >> 11167173

Bronchial blocker compared to double-lumen tube for one-lung ventilation during thoracoscopy.

C Bauer1, C Winter, J G Hentz, X Ducrocq, A Steib, J P Dupeyron.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) requires one-lung ventilation with a properly collapsed lung. This study compared the Broncho-Cath double-lumen endotracheal tube with the Wiruthan bronchial blocker to determine the advantages of one device over the other during anaesthesia with one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopy.
METHODS: Thirty-five patients undergoing VATS were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Sixteen patients received a left-sided double-lumen tube (DLT) and nineteen a Wiruthan bronchial blocker (BB). The BB group was subdivided in two: BB in the right mainstem bronchus (BBR) for right-sided VATS (9 patients), BB in the left mainstem bronchus (BBL) for left-sided VATS (10 patients). The position of the devices was checked using a fibreoptic bronchoscope. The following variables were measured: 1) number of unsuccessful placement attempts; 2) number of malpositions of the devices; 3) time required to place the device in the correct position; 4) number of secondary dislodgements of the devices after turning the patient into the lateral decubitus position. The quality of lung deflation was evaluated by the surgeons who were blinded to the type of tube being used.
RESULTS: The number of unsuccessful placement attempts was one in the DLT group (1/16), three in the BBL group (3/10) and none in the BBR group (0/9). The number of malpositions was significantly greater in the BBL group (10/10) compared to the DLT group (2/16) and to the BBR group (1/9) (P<0.001). The time (mean+/-SD) required to place a BBL was 4.21 min+/-1.28, significantly longer than the time required to place a DLT (2.26 min+/-0.55, P<0.0006) or a BBR (2.41 min+/-0.53, P<0.008). The difference in placement time between DLT and BBR was not significant. The number of secondary dislodgements was one in the DLT group, one in the BBR group and none in the BBL group (NS). The quality of lung deflation was judged excellent or fair in all patients in the DLT and the BBL groups and poor in 44% of the patients in the BBR group.
CONCLUSION: It took significantly longer to place a left BB than a DLT (P<0.0006) or a right BB (P<0.008). The number of initial malpositionings of the left BB was significantly greater than in the other groups (P<0.001). The quality of lung deflation was better in the BBL and in the DLT groups than in the BBR group. We conclude that for routine use during left-sided VATS, the use of a DLT is preferable to a left BB because of its greater ease of placement. For right-sided VATS, DLT and right BB showed the same facility of placement but the DLT provided a better quality of lung deflation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11167173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand        ISSN: 0001-5172            Impact factor:   2.105


  9 in total

1.  Effective use of bronchial blockers in lung isolation surgery: an analysis of 130 cases.

Authors:  Logan Kosarek; Eric Busch; Abbas Abbas; Jason Falterman; Bobby D Nossaman
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

2.  Double-lumen endotracheal tubes and bronchial blockers exhibit similar lung collapse physiology during lung isolation.

Authors:  Olivier Moreault; Etienne J Couture; Steeve Provencher; Jacques Somma; Jens Lohser; Paula A Ugalde; Jérôme Lemieux; François Lellouche; Jean S Bussières
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Airway management in anesthesia for thoracic surgery: a "real life" observational study.

Authors:  Nicola Langiano; Silvia Fiorelli; Cristian Deana; Antonio Baroselli; Elena Giovanna Bignami; Carola Matellon; Livia Pompei; Anna Tornaghi; Federico Piccioni; Remo Orsetti; Cecilia Coccia; Noemi Sacchi; Rocco D'Andrea; Luca Brazzi; Carlo Franco; Rosanna Accardo; Antonio Di Fuccia; Francesco Baldinelli; Pasquale De Negri; Angelo Gratarola; Chiara Angeletti; Francesco Pugliese; Marco Valerio Micozzi; Domenico Massullo; Giorgio Della Rocca
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.005

4.  Bronchial blocker and double-lumen endotracheal tube combination to facilitate lung isolation during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hong Liang; Mathew Thomas; J Ross Renew
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Clinical review: Independent lung ventilation in critical care.

Authors:  Devanand Anantham; Raghuram Jagadesan; Philip Eng Cher Tiew
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 9.097

6.  An innovative way to reinsert dislodged Arndt blocker using urological glide wire.

Authors:  Rahul Pillai; Sneha Ann Ancheri; Sathish Kumar Dharmalingam; Raj Sahajanandan
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

7.  Unusual airways management during one-lung ventilation in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Paolo Primieri; Paolo Ancona; Elisabetta Gualtieri
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

8.  Management of Pulmonary Hemorrhage Complicating Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy.

Authors:  Adam A Dalia; Scott Streckenbach; Mike Andrawes; Richard Channick; Cameron Wright; Michael Fitzsimons
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-11-21

9.  A comparison between bronchial blockers and double-lumen tubes for patients undergoing lung resection: A propensity score-matched cohort study.

Authors:  Lin Yang; Xiaojin Wei; Bin Wang; Ruping Dai; Feng Xiao; Junmei Xu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 3.642

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.