Literature DB >> 11165859

Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery.

L N Thibos1, D Horner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the power vector method of representing and analyzing spherocylindrical refractive errors.
SETTING: School of Optometry, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
METHODS: Manifest and keratometric refractive errors were expressed as power vectors suitable for plotting as points in a 3-dimensional dioptric space. The 3 Cartesian coordinates (x, y, z) of each power vector correspond to the powers of 3 lenses that, in combination, fulfill a refractive prescription: a spherical lens of power M, a Jackson crossed cylinder of power J0 with axes at 90 degrees and 180 degrees, and a Jackson crossed cylinder of power J45 with axes at 45 degrees and 135 degrees. The Pythagorean length of the power vector, B, is a measure of overall blurring strength of a spherocylindrical lens or refractive error. Changes in refractive error due to surgery were computed by the ordinary rules of vector subtraction.
RESULTS: Frequency distributions of blur strength (B) clearly demonstrate the effectiveness of refractive surgery in reducing the overall blurring effect of uncorrected refractive error.
CONCLUSIONS: Power vector analysis also revealed a reduction in the astigmatic component of these refractive errors. Paired comparisons revealed that the change in manifest astigmatism due to surgery was well correlated with the change in keratometric astigmatism. Power vectors aid the visualization of complex changes in refractive error by tracing a trajectory in a uniform dioptric space. The Cartesian components of a power vector are mutually independent, which simplifies mathematical and statistical analysis of refractive errors. Power vectors also provide a natural link to a more comprehensive optical description of ocular refractive imperfections in terms of wavefront aberration functions and their description by Zernike polynomials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11165859     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(00)00797-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  80 in total

1.  Change on the horizontal and vertical meridians of the cornea after cataract surgery.

Authors:  J C Merriam; L Zheng; J Urbanowicz; M Zaider
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

2.  Femtosecond lenticule extraction (ReLEx) for correction of hyperopia - first results.

Authors:  Marcus Blum; Kathleen S Kunert; Urs Voßmerbäumer; Walter Sekundo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  [Nomograms for the improvement of refractive outcomes].

Authors:  M Mrochen; F Hafezi; H P Iseli; J Löffler; T Seiler
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Change of refractive state and eye size in children of birth weight less than 1701 g.

Authors:  A R O'Connor; T J Stephenson; A Johnson; M J Tobin; S Ratib; A R Fielder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Changes in astigmatism and corneal higher-order aberrations after phacoemulsification with toric intraocular lens implantation for mild keratoconus with cataract.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kamiya; Kimiya Shimizu; Toshiyuki Miyake
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Long-term rotational stability and visual outcomes of a single-piece hydrophilic acrylic toric IOL: a 1.5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Balázs Gyöngyössy; Paul Jirak; Ulrich Schönherr
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Accuracy of wavefront aberrometer refraction vs manifest refraction in cataract patients: impact of age, ametropia and visual function.

Authors:  Jan O Huelle; Toam Katz; Jan Draeger; Milena Pahlitzsch; Vasyl Druchkiv; Johannes Steinberg; Gisbert Richard; Stephan J Linke
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Pilot study of hyperopic LASIK using the solid-state laser technology.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Francisco J Blanes-Mompó; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Antonio Alzamora-Rodríguez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Simulated Keratometry Repeatability in Subjects with and without Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Ayeswarya Ravikumar; Jason D Marsack; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Comparison of refractive assessment by wavefront aberrometry, autorefraction, and subjective refraction.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Bennett; Gina M Stalboerger; David O Hodge; Muriel M Schornack
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.