BACKGROUND: Nomograms are efficient tools to improve the predictability of refractive procedures by using statistical methods to analyze pre- and postoperative refractive data. The purpose of this work was to analyze the clinical relevance and limitations of nomograms in a case series. METHODS: Computer simulations based on the known unpredictability for refractive outcomes were performed for three different distribution functions of the preoperative refractions. In addition, the clinical applicability was investigated in three different cohorts that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). RESULTS: The use of individual nomograms significantly improves the predictability of the refractive outcome. However, theoretical investigation demonstrates that a homogeneous data distribution within cohorts is a key factor for predictable nomogram calculations. Outliers within the cohorts are not integrated into the nomogram calculation due to the mathematical model used. CONCLUSIONS: Nomograms are helpful for improving refractive outcomes. However, they are currently limited to approximately 90% within +/-0.5 D.
BACKGROUND: Nomograms are efficient tools to improve the predictability of refractive procedures by using statistical methods to analyze pre- and postoperative refractive data. The purpose of this work was to analyze the clinical relevance and limitations of nomograms in a case series. METHODS: Computer simulations based on the known unpredictability for refractive outcomes were performed for three different distribution functions of the preoperative refractions. In addition, the clinical applicability was investigated in three different cohorts that underwent laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). RESULTS: The use of individual nomograms significantly improves the predictability of the refractive outcome. However, theoretical investigation demonstrates that a homogeneous data distribution within cohorts is a key factor for predictable nomogram calculations. Outliers within the cohorts are not integrated into the nomogram calculation due to the mathematical model used. CONCLUSIONS: Nomograms are helpful for improving refractive outcomes. However, they are currently limited to approximately 90% within +/-0.5 D.
Authors: T Kohnen; G W Steinkamp; E M Schnitzler; M Baumeister; G Wellermann; J Bühren; M Brieden; S Herting; A Mirshahi; C Ohrloff Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 1.059