Literature DB >> 11164528

Visual discrimination learning in the water maze: a novel test for visual acuity.

L Robinson1, H Bridge, G Riedel.   

Abstract

Learning about space, the environment and specific objects comprising three-dimensional arrangements requires processing of visual information. As learning and memory experiments in mammals rely heavily on normal processing of visual cues, drug-induced disruption of acquisition learning or memory formation necessitates the important control for visual acuity. A popular task used frequently for rats is the Morris water maze. However, previously used visual tasks in the water maze only control for gross visual disturbances. Here we describe a new training procedure enabling visual acuity to be tested in the water maze. Animals were trained to discriminate between two cue cards containing a pattern of vertical black and white stripes. Cards were presented in two adjacent quadrants separated by a barrier with the escape platform located in front of the smaller stripes (1 cm wide). Once 80% correct responses were attained, the wider cue card (normally 5 cm wide stripes) was randomly changed to gratings of 1,2,3,4,5, and 10 cm width. Animals learned the discrimination with acuity of 1.5 c/deg. A detailed analysis of the swim patterns further suggests that, independent of the grating used, animals make a choice immediately after release and swim along the walls towards the cue. In a further acuity test taken a few weeks later when animals were given saline infusions, performance was better than in the first test suggesting an effect of learning. This novel test may prove useful in determining subtle drug-induced deficits in visual acuity that may contribute to disruption of spatial performance in the water maze.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11164528     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00334-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  5 in total

1.  The influence of visual ability on learning and memory performance in 13 strains of mice.

Authors:  Richard E Brown; Aimée A Wong
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  The mouse model of Down syndrome Ts65Dn presents visual deficits as assessed by pattern visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Jonah Jacob Scott-McKean; Bo Chang; Ronald E Hurd; Steven Nusinowitz; Cecilia Schmidt; Muriel T Davisson; Alberto C S Costa
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Classical MHCI molecules regulate retinogeniculate refinement and limit ocular dominance plasticity.

Authors:  Akash Datwani; Michael J McConnell; Patrick O Kanold; Kristina D Micheva; Brad Busse; Mehrdad Shamloo; Stephen J Smith; Carla J Shatz
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Longitudinal Performance of Senescence Accelerated Mouse Prone-Strain 8 (SAMP8) Mice in an Olfactory-Visual Water Maze Challenge.

Authors:  Virginie Lam; Ryusuke Takechi; Matthew A Albrecht; Zachary John D'Alonzo; Liam Graneri; Mark J Hackett; Stephanie Coulson; Nicholas Fimognari; Michael Nesbit; John C L Mamo
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  An Automated Water Task to Test Visual Discrimination Performance, Adaptive Strategies and Stereotyped Choices in Freely Moving Mice.

Authors:  Mario Treviño; Esteban Fregoso; Carlos Sahagún; Elí Lezama
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.558

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.