Literature DB >> 11164453

Nonlinear contribution of eye velocity to motion perception.

K A Turano1, R W Massof.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that an extra-retinal signal combines with retinal velocity in a linear manner as described by existing models to determine perceived velocity. To do so, we utilized a method that allowed the determination of the relative contributions of the retinal-velocity and the extra-retinal signals for the perception of stimulus velocity. We determined the velocity (speed and direction) of a stimulus viewed with stationary eyes that was perceptually the same as the velocity of the stimulus viewed with moving eyes. Eye movements were governed by the tracking (or pursuit) of a separate pursuit target. The velocity-matching data were unable to be fit with a model that linearly combined a retinal-velocity signal and an extra-retinal signal. A model that was successful in explaining the data was one that takes the difference between two simple saturating non-linear functions, g and f, each symmetric about the origin, but one having an interaction term. That is, the function g has two arguments: retinal velocity, R, and eye velocity, E. The only argument to f is retinal velocity, R. Each argument has a scaling parameter. A comparison of the goodness of fits between models demonstrated that the success of the model is the interaction term, i.e. the modification of the compensating eye velocity signal by the retinal velocity prior to combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11164453     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00255-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Cortical oscillatory changes in human middle temporal cortex underlying smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Benjamin T Dunkley; Tom C A Freeman; Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy; Krish D Singh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Perceived motion direction during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Ignace Th C Hooge; Alexander H Wertheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Localization and motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Ignace Th C Hooge; Alexander H Wertheim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The perception of motion smear during eye and head movements.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Jianliang Tong; Murat Aydin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-09-25       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Frame of reference transformations in motion perception during smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jan L Souman; Ignace Th C Hooge; Alexander H Wertheim
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 1.621

6.  Long range frontal/posterior phase synchronization during remembered pursuit task is impaired in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Nithin Krishna; Hugh O'Neill; Eva María Sánchez-Morla; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Response to unexpected target changes during sustained visual tracking in schizophrenic patients.

Authors:  L Elliot Hong; Matthew T Avila; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Is motion perception deficit in schizophrenia a consequence of eye-tracking abnormality?

Authors:  L Elliot Hong; Kathleen A Turano; Hugh B O'Neill; Lei Hao; Ikwunga Wonodi; Robert P McMahon; Gunvant K Thaker
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  A Bayesian model of perceived head-centered velocity during smooth pursuit eye movement.

Authors:  Tom C A Freeman; Rebecca A Champion; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.