OBJECTIVES: The clinical course of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder is highly variable. Our objective in this study was to describe E-cadherin expression patterns in CIS with and without papillary disease and to determine whether altered E-cadherin expression is associated with disease progression and survival in patients with CIS of the bladder. METHODS: Tumor specimens from 53 patients who had CIS in the absence of muscle-invasive carcinoma on bladder biopsy were identified. Formalin-fixed paraffin sections were processed using a hot citric acid antigen retrieval method, followed by immunostaining with anti-E-cadherin monoclonal antibody. Expression patterns were evaluated in a blinded fashion and scored as normal and abnormal, which included absent and various degrees of heterogeneous immunostaining. Outcomes analyzed were recurrence, progression, and survival. RESULTS: Loss of normal membrane E-cadherin immunoreactivity was found in 17 patients (32%). At a median follow-up of 131 months, abnormal E-cadherin expression was significantly associated with disease recurrence (P = 0.0087), disease progression (P = 0.0003), and bladder cancer-specific survival (P = 0.0285). In multivariate analyses, E-cadherin expression was independently associated with disease recurrence (P = 0.019, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.342 to 5.940), disease progression (P = 0.002, 95% CI 2.049 to 17.989), and bladder cancer-specific survival (P = 0.025, 95% CI 1.179 to 10.432). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of E-cadherin expression in patients CIS with and without papillary disease of the bladder predicts disease recurrence, disease progression, and bladder cancer-specific death. CIS with and without papillary disease associated with abnormal E-cadherin expression may represent a biologically more aggressive cancer, requiring early definitive therapy. This hypothesis should be evaluated in larger studies and prospective clinical trials.
OBJECTIVES: The clinical course of carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the bladder is highly variable. Our objective in this study was to describe E-cadherin expression patterns in CIS with and without papillary disease and to determine whether altered E-cadherin expression is associated with disease progression and survival in patients with CIS of the bladder. METHODS: Tumor specimens from 53 patients who had CIS in the absence of muscle-invasive carcinoma on bladder biopsy were identified. Formalin-fixed paraffin sections were processed using a hot citric acid antigen retrieval method, followed by immunostaining with anti-E-cadherin monoclonal antibody. Expression patterns were evaluated in a blinded fashion and scored as normal and abnormal, which included absent and various degrees of heterogeneous immunostaining. Outcomes analyzed were recurrence, progression, and survival. RESULTS: Loss of normal membrane E-cadherin immunoreactivity was found in 17 patients (32%). At a median follow-up of 131 months, abnormal E-cadherin expression was significantly associated with disease recurrence (P = 0.0087), disease progression (P = 0.0003), and bladder cancer-specific survival (P = 0.0285). In multivariate analyses, E-cadherin expression was independently associated with disease recurrence (P = 0.019, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.342 to 5.940), disease progression (P = 0.002, 95% CI 2.049 to 17.989), and bladder cancer-specific survival (P = 0.025, 95% CI 1.179 to 10.432). CONCLUSIONS: Loss of E-cadherin expression in patients CIS with and without papillary disease of the bladder predicts disease recurrence, disease progression, and bladder cancer-specific death. CIS with and without papillary disease associated with abnormal E-cadherin expression may represent a biologically more aggressive cancer, requiring early definitive therapy. This hypothesis should be evaluated in larger studies and prospective clinical trials.
Authors: Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Jose L Ordóñez; Ana P Otero; Ana Blanca; Vicky Sevillano; Marta Sanchez-Carbayo; Elisa Muñoz; Liang Cheng; Rodolfo Montironi; Enrique de Alava Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2010-09-07 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Burkhard Helpap; Bernd J Schmitz-Dräger; Peter W Hamilton; Giovanni Muzzonigro; Andrea B Galosi; Karl H Kurth; David Lubaroff; David J Waters; Michael J Droller Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Wolfgang Otto; Shahrokh F Shariat; Hans-Martin Fritsche; Amit Gupta; Kazumasa Matsumoto; Wassim Kassouf; Guido Martignoni; Thomas J Walton; Stefan Tritschler; Shiro Baba; Patrick J Bastian; Juan I Martínez-Salamanca; Christian Seitz; Armin Pycha; Maximilian Burger; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara Journal: World J Urol Date: 2011-01-20 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Maha Hussain; Stephanie Daignault; Neeraj Agarwal; Petros D Grivas; Arlene O Siefker-Radtke; Igor Puzanov; Gary R MacVicar; Ellis Glenn Levine; Sandy Srinivas; Przemyslaw Twardowski; Mario A Eisenberger; David I Quinn; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Evan Y Yu; Scott Dawsey; Kathleen C Day; Mark L Day; Mahmoud Al-Hawary; David C Smith Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Z Adhim; T Matsuoka; T Bito; K Shigemura; K-M Lee; M Kawabata; M Fujisawa; K Nibu; T Shirakawa Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-07-12 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: K M Rieger-Christ; L Ng; R S Hanley; O Durrani; H Ma; A S Yee; J A Libertino; I C Summerhayes Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2005-06-20 Impact factor: 7.640